<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oscar Moment: &#8220;Invictus&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marshallandthemovies.com/2009/11/10/invictusom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marshallandthemovies.com/2009/11/10/invictusom/</link>
	<description>A blog to foster conversation through the glorious medium of film</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marshall</title>
		<link>http://marshallandthemovies.com/2009/11/10/invictusom/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marshallandthemovies.com/?p=1151#comment-241</guid>
		<description>I don’t really want any movie to fail … even movies like “The Road” and “The Lovely Bones,” adaptations of books that I loathed. Maybe the destruction of the source material that has become a staple of adaptations in Hollywood will make me like it.

I like “Atonement,” but I don’t love it. The film dragged horrifically in the Dunkirk and Romola Gorai section. The Redgrave section was exceptional, and the Ronan section was so beautiful that I was willing to overlook a few narrative missteps.

The reason I drew the comparison that I did was because those were all the frontrunners from day 1. I just think it is interesting that recently, none of these movies have capitalized on their status and won the most coveted prize in the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t really want any movie to fail … even movies like “The Road” and “The Lovely Bones,” adaptations of books that I loathed. Maybe the destruction of the source material that has become a staple of adaptations in Hollywood will make me like it.</p>
<p>I like “Atonement,” but I don’t love it. The film dragged horrifically in the Dunkirk and Romola Gorai section. The Redgrave section was exceptional, and the Ronan section was so beautiful that I was willing to overlook a few narrative missteps.</p>
<p>The reason I drew the comparison that I did was because those were all the frontrunners from day 1. I just think it is interesting that recently, none of these movies have capitalized on their status and won the most coveted prize in the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Encore Entertainment</title>
		<link>http://marshallandthemovies.com/2009/11/10/invictusom/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Encore Entertainment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marshallandthemovies.com/?p=1151#comment-236</guid>
		<description>People were disappointed with Atonement. And as much as I like Dreamgirls...you compare it to Atonement, Benjamin?

And to be honest, though I understand the prestige of winning the Oscar. All the good ones can&#039;t and 13 nods, and 7 nods is respectable as is a nomination for Best Picture. Well it was. With ten nominees, I can&#039;t say.

PS. So did you like Atonement? And I do think [hope] Invictus fails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People were disappointed with Atonement. And as much as I like Dreamgirls&#8230;you compare it to Atonement, Benjamin?</p>
<p>And to be honest, though I understand the prestige of winning the Oscar. All the good ones can&#8217;t and 13 nods, and 7 nods is respectable as is a nomination for Best Picture. Well it was. With ten nominees, I can&#8217;t say.</p>
<p>PS. So did you like Atonement? And I do think [hope] Invictus fails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
