<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What To Look Forward To In &#8230; December 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marshallandthemovies.com/2009/11/14/december2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marshallandthemovies.com/2009/11/14/december2009/</link>
	<description>&#34;[Bloggers] like you give me hope&#34; - Roger Ebert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:57:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: theteencritic</title>
		<link>http://marshallandthemovies.com/2009/11/14/december2009/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theteencritic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marshallandthemovies.com/?p=1144#comment-254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marshall, the $500 million price tag on &quot;Avatar&quot; is a myth and a rumor, and has been debunked by the producers. Now, granted, the ACTUAL price of $230 million isn&#039;t something to sniff at (it&#039;s just under the overall budget for 2005&#039;s &quot;King Kong,&quot; which was $245 million, but over the individual budgets for the &quot;Lord of the Rings&quot; films), but it ain&#039;t half a mil. I&#039;m not getting on your back about it or anything, but I just found this out the other day. Go to IMDb and you&#039;ll find this out in a heartbeat. You&#039;ll also find out that it&#039;s 166 minutes, which has nothing to do with what I just said, but it still excites me, as I love long sci-fi/fantasy movies. :P

That said, &quot;Avatar&quot; remains my Numero Uno the rest of the year, followed VERY closely by &quot;Nine&quot; and &quot;Up in the Air.&quot; If those were the only three movies coming out, I&#039;d be happy, but luckily, there&#039;s a frickin&#039; ton of other worthy viewings to be had. I also want to see just about everything else you&#039;ve mentioned, with the exception of &quot;Transylmania&quot; (which looks painful) and &quot;Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel&quot; (which I&#039;ll see, regardless of how horrid it looks, just for morbid interest purposes).  I think that &quot;Invictus&quot; and &quot;The Princess and the Frog&quot; round out my top five anticipated for the rest of the year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall, the $500 million price tag on &#8220;Avatar&#8221; is a myth and a rumor, and has been debunked by the producers. Now, granted, the ACTUAL price of $230 million isn&#8217;t something to sniff at (it&#8217;s just under the overall budget for 2005&#8242;s &#8220;King Kong,&#8221; which was $245 million, but over the individual budgets for the &#8220;Lord of the Rings&#8221; films), but it ain&#8217;t half a mil. I&#8217;m not getting on your back about it or anything, but I just found this out the other day. Go to IMDb and you&#8217;ll find this out in a heartbeat. You&#8217;ll also find out that it&#8217;s 166 minutes, which has nothing to do with what I just said, but it still excites me, as I love long sci-fi/fantasy movies. <img src='http://s2.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>That said, &#8220;Avatar&#8221; remains my Numero Uno the rest of the year, followed VERY closely by &#8220;Nine&#8221; and &#8220;Up in the Air.&#8221; If those were the only three movies coming out, I&#8217;d be happy, but luckily, there&#8217;s a frickin&#8217; ton of other worthy viewings to be had. I also want to see just about everything else you&#8217;ve mentioned, with the exception of &#8220;Transylmania&#8221; (which looks painful) and &#8220;Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel&#8221; (which I&#8217;ll see, regardless of how horrid it looks, just for morbid interest purposes).  I think that &#8220;Invictus&#8221; and &#8220;The Princess and the Frog&#8221; round out my top five anticipated for the rest of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

