<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2009 Academy Award Nominations!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marshallandthemovies.com/2010/02/02/2009oscarnominations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marshallandthemovies.com/2010/02/02/2009oscarnominations/</link>
	<description>&#34;[Bloggers] like you give me hope&#34; - Roger Ebert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:57:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: theteencritic</title>
		<link>http://marshallandthemovies.com/2010/02/02/2009oscarnominations/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theteencritic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marshallandthemovies.com/?p=2217#comment-504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This&#039;ll take a bit, but if you want more, head over to my blog, Marshall and read in full my reaction.

Best Picture:

I have yet to see &quot;A Serious Man&quot; (REALLY REALLY WANT TO), but I think the nomination for &quot;The Blind Side&quot; is stupid and pandering.  Not nominating &quot;(500) Days of Summer,&quot; &quot;The Hangover,&quot; or &quot;Star Trek&quot; is probably going to bite them in the butt for the next month.  I have no problem with any of the other nominees though.

Best Actor and Supporting Actor:

The locks in both are Bridges and Waltz. I have no issue with the other nominees, but I think Morgan Freeman is the odd man out here.  I personally was more taken with just about six more performances in this category.  Matt Damon might&#039;ve been fantastic in the overhyped &quot;Invictus,&quot; but he was INFINITELY better in &quot;The Informant!&quot; and I think was nominated in the wrong category for the wrong movie.  Also who could&#039;ve been nominated: Sharlto Copley for &quot;District 9,&quot; Daniel Day-Lewis for &quot;Nine,&quot; Robert Downey Jr. for &quot;Sherlock Holmes,&quot; Viggo Mortensen for &quot;The Road,&quot; and Michael Stuhlbarg for &quot;A Serious Man.&quot;  In the Supporting Actor category, I think I could&#039;ve switched Matt Damon with either Michael Fassbender for &quot;Inglourious Basterds&quot; or Stanley Tucci for his brilliant, underappreciated turn in &quot;Julie &amp; Julia.&quot;

My favorite category is probably Best Original Score, since we have the best score of the year in Hans Zimmer&#039;s &quot;Sherlock Holmes&quot; masterpiece.  The film wasn&#039;t perfect, but that score was.  Alexandre Desplat&#039;s work on &quot;Fantastic Mr. Fox&quot; was complimentary to my favorite animated film of the year.  I think Michael Giacchino could&#039;ve been nom&#039;d for either &quot;Up&quot; or &quot;Star Trek&quot; and I would&#039;ve been happy, but the &quot;Star Trek&quot; score was better in my mind.  Horner&#039;s work in &quot;Avatar&quot; is indeed derivative, but blood-pumping.  The biggest snub in this category is Marvin Hamlisch&#039;s brilliantly kitschy scoring for &quot;The Informant!&quot;

That&#039;s all for right now, as I&#039;m tired, but I will say that I&#039;m content with a large majority of these nominations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This&#8217;ll take a bit, but if you want more, head over to my blog, Marshall and read in full my reaction.</p>
<p>Best Picture:</p>
<p>I have yet to see &#8220;A Serious Man&#8221; (REALLY REALLY WANT TO), but I think the nomination for &#8220;The Blind Side&#8221; is stupid and pandering.  Not nominating &#8220;(500) Days of Summer,&#8221; &#8220;The Hangover,&#8221; or &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; is probably going to bite them in the butt for the next month.  I have no problem with any of the other nominees though.</p>
<p>Best Actor and Supporting Actor:</p>
<p>The locks in both are Bridges and Waltz. I have no issue with the other nominees, but I think Morgan Freeman is the odd man out here.  I personally was more taken with just about six more performances in this category.  Matt Damon might&#8217;ve been fantastic in the overhyped &#8220;Invictus,&#8221; but he was INFINITELY better in &#8220;The Informant!&#8221; and I think was nominated in the wrong category for the wrong movie.  Also who could&#8217;ve been nominated: Sharlto Copley for &#8220;District 9,&#8221; Daniel Day-Lewis for &#8220;Nine,&#8221; Robert Downey Jr. for &#8220;Sherlock Holmes,&#8221; Viggo Mortensen for &#8220;The Road,&#8221; and Michael Stuhlbarg for &#8220;A Serious Man.&#8221;  In the Supporting Actor category, I think I could&#8217;ve switched Matt Damon with either Michael Fassbender for &#8220;Inglourious Basterds&#8221; or Stanley Tucci for his brilliant, underappreciated turn in &#8220;Julie &amp; Julia.&#8221;</p>
<p>My favorite category is probably Best Original Score, since we have the best score of the year in Hans Zimmer&#8217;s &#8220;Sherlock Holmes&#8221; masterpiece.  The film wasn&#8217;t perfect, but that score was.  Alexandre Desplat&#8217;s work on &#8220;Fantastic Mr. Fox&#8221; was complimentary to my favorite animated film of the year.  I think Michael Giacchino could&#8217;ve been nom&#8217;d for either &#8220;Up&#8221; or &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; and I would&#8217;ve been happy, but the &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; score was better in my mind.  Horner&#8217;s work in &#8220;Avatar&#8221; is indeed derivative, but blood-pumping.  The biggest snub in this category is Marvin Hamlisch&#8217;s brilliantly kitschy scoring for &#8220;The Informant!&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all for right now, as I&#8217;m tired, but I will say that I&#8217;m content with a large majority of these nominations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

