I’m fully prepared to take a lot of heat for what I’m about to say. In fact, as I ponder making this statement in my head, I myself wonder if I’m a humongous hypocrite. What I’m about to suggest could spark some serious outrage, perhaps on the level of suggesting “Citizen Kane” isn’t all that great (which I have gone on the record as saying is false).
I’d like to see “Vertigo,” with the same script, comparable actors, and the same Hitchcock penchant for filmmaking, be remade in the present day.
There, I said it. It’s out there, I can’t take it back. But while watching “Vertigo,” I was struck by the powerful and affecting portrait of a mentally disturbed policeman played by James Stewart. I found Kim Novak’s work as the woman who claims to be possessed by the spirit of a dead woman to be frightening. I felt Hitchcock’s masterful storytelling with the camera to be totally present. I was totally engaged by the smart writing, which harkens to a mystery of almost mythical proportions.
Yet the visuals just felt so … outdated. Yes, this is obvious given that the movie is over half a century old. Obviously, it was about as good as it got back then. But this is 2011, and when the camera is stuck in the past while the story remains timeless, it can’t help but be distracting. In fact, it goes beyond that – it detracts. The movie’s style now alienates us from the movie, pulling us out to remind us, “Oh, this is a movie, and this is how they could visually represent the fear of heights back then.”
So to maintain that pervasive sense of acrophobia, why not remake “Vertigo” with modern technology that would make this classic story work so much better for the audiences of today? Isn’t that why we should be remaking movies? Not just to be lazy or to sloppily “update” it to market to younger crowds, a remake of “Vertigo” that preserved the timeless integrity of the acting and storytelling would be perfect. Because, perhaps with the exception of historic visual achievements, the look of a movie is something that should hold power no matter if it’s being shown in 1958 or 2011. I’m convinced that it would have rocked me to my core had my eyes been borrowed from that era.