The Oscars are a great cultural conversation for all to participate in, but it’s all too easy to only have surface knowledge of the nominees. It’s all too easy to know “Black Swan” as the ballet movie, “The Fighter” as the boxing movie, and “The Social Network” as the Facebook movie. But don’t you want to know more and stun your friends with your knowledge of the movies in the weeks leading up to the awards and ultimately during the broadcast itself?
That’s what my KNOW YOUR NOMINEES series hopes to do. Every three days, I’ll feature ten interesting facts about the ten Best Picture nominees of 2010 that would be fascinating to pepper into any conversation. My hope is that you will come away with an enhanced appreciation of the movies but also enjoy learning strange and interesting things about them.
So, as we proceed in alphabetical order, our next stop on the tour is “The King’s Speech.”
“The King’s Speech” should feel like a very personal movie for a number of reasons, but probably chief among them is screenwriter David Seidler. As a boy growing up in England in the 1930s and ’40s, Seidler was a stammerer and idolized King George VI for his ability to overcome his problem. He had to wait many years to secure the rights to write a movie about his hero, mainly due to being asked personally by the Queen Mother (played by Helena Bonham Carter in the film) to pass away. Seidler then wrote it as a play, which director Tom Hooper saw and decided to make into a movie.
The director then added his own personal touch to the movie as well. Hooper stated in an interview that “The King’s Speech” is really a movie about his family. For example, the opening scene of the movie showing the preparations for the radio broadcast is an homage to his sister, a presenter for Radio 4. But mainly the connection comes from the relationship between the British Bertie and Australian Logue as Hooper has an Australian mother and an English father. He talked greatly in interviews about the interesting relationship between the two countries and how he conveyed it in the movie.
Lionel Logue, King George’s speech therapist played in the movie by Geoffrey Rush, kept a detailed set of diaries chronicling his work (although they don’t start until the coronation of the king). However, the diaries were not made available to the filmmakers until nine weeks before the shoot. Hooper has said that the only changes they made were for the sake of accuracy, and nothing was drastically altered. He also stated in an interview that some of the best lines in the movie were taken directly from the diary. For example, after the climactic speech, Logue jokingly says, “You still stammered on the w,” to which King George replies, “Well, I had to throw in a few so they knew that it was me.”
Colin Firth looks like a sure-fire winner for Best Actor, but this easily could have been someone else. Firth was actually the third choice to play King George VI and only received the role after first Paul Bettany and then Hugh Grant passed. Neither have Oscars at home on their mantle, so I’m pretty sure that both are regretting this decision.
So how did Firth nail down that stammer, which he executes so immaculately in “The King’s Speech?” What might be surprising is that Firth did not work with a speech therapist. He did, however, use a dialogue coach who helped him make the stammer come from a very personal place while also not affecting the pacing of the movie (imagine how dreadful the movie would be if it took him 20 minutes to utter each word). A speech therapist did come to some of the rehearsals for the movie, and Firth’s sister is also a vocal therapist, which he claims was very helpful for consulting purposes. He also talked a lot with screenwriter David Seidler, who compared stuttering to being “underwater.”
Does stammering come with side effects? For Colin Firth, it did. During the shoot, he claims to have suffered from some headaches and neck tension. But the more debilitating toll was on his arm, which became numb, went to sleep and thus hard to use. He went to the set doctor who had little to offer due to the lack of precedent.
Helena Bonham Carter received her second Academy Award nomination for her work in “The King’s Speech,” but just as the case was with many of this year’s nominees, she almost missed the chance. Due to her commitment on the “Harry Potter” movies, Carter turned down the role numerous times despite director Tom Hooper’s insistence. Yet she did star in “The King’s Speech” by making what she calls an “illegal” maneuver – shooting BOTH at the same time. Carter would go off on the weekends and shoot her scenes for Tom Hooper while never being truly “released” from the “Harry Potter” sets.
How do you get a good actor – an Academy Award winning actor, for that matter – to play a convincing mediocre actor? Tom Hooper got Geoffrey Rush to do some unconvincing Shakespeare by shooting the scene on the first day with English actors in the room who knew that Rush had some experience with Shakespeare. To quote Rush, “I was nervous and I was bad, and he just shot it.”
What of the royal reaction to the film? Queen Elizabeth II, George’s daughter portrayed in the movie as a young girl, gave “The King’s Speech” her seal of approval. Cynics might ask how much Harvey Weinstein paid for it; others are probably just thrilled to see the royal family showing interest in popular culture.
Cynics might also say that “The King’s Speech” is a stuffy British royal family costume drama that’s totally designed to win over the Academy. The last part seems to be somewhat true, but it’s hardly stuffy like most other movies about royal life. Director Tom Hooper is largely responsible for that. He stated in an interview that he purposefully set up the opening and closing shots of Bertie/George VI so that the movie would stand apart from others in the genre. We first meet Bertie in normal clothes, not looking all snazzy in his royal get-up. The movie closes reaffirming King George and Lionel Logue’s friendship, not with him cured of his stammer as if by magic or medicine.
Check back on February 13 as the KNOW YOUR NOMINEES series continues with “127 Hours.”