REVIEW: Human Capital

10 02 2015

Human CapitalHuman Capital” begins with an unsuspecting waiter getting run off the side of an Italian road and being left for dead.  Surprisingly, this is one of the least interesting things the film has to offer.

Writer/director Paolo Virzì weaves a tale of two families in Northern Italy clearly separate by wealth and class, not to mention power and prestige.  The Ossolas are the middle-class striving for better status and standing, while the Bruneschis are comfortably entrenched in their lavish lifestyle.  When the husbands, wives, daughters, and sons get entangled in a dangerous game where personal vices put everyone’s position at stake.

Rather than crosscut all their stories into one sprawling opus, Virzì divides them into four sections from a different person’s perspective.  This more novel, unconventional approach breathes some wind into the sails of “Human Captial.”  Heck, it even somewhat recalls early films of Alejandro Gonzalez Iñárritu, such as “Amores Perroes.”

Overall, he provides a biting and quite incisive look at structural class differences that feels applicable to societies other than Italy.  That makes sense when considering that “Human Capital” is based on an American novel (written by an alumnus of my own Wake Forest University, no less) and transferred across continents.  These are the kinds of stories and themes that filmmakers in the United States are neglecting, and rather shamefully so in a post-Occupy Wall Street world.  For all those looking for a chronicle of class conflict after exhausting all the F. Scott Fitzgerald canon, this film would make a more than satisfying selection.  B+3stars





REVIEW: The Voices

9 02 2015

The VoicesThe Voices” takes a protagonist plagued by mental illness, as in “Silver Linings Playbook,” and combines him with the unsuspecting, mild-mannered murderer like in “Bernie.”  The film’s Jerry, as played by Ryan Reynolds, is an outwardly cheery factory worker whose schizophrenia makes him subject to violent impulses.  He can mostly suppress these urges, yet the invented voices of his cat and dog begin to lure him into violence against the women of his company’s accounting department.

As he knocks off characters played by Gemma Arterton and Anna Kendrick, director Marjane Sartrapi aims for a tone of black comedy that never really sticks.  Sartrapi showed with her Oscar-nominated “Persepolis” that she can make a character with only two dimensions feel as whole as any actual human, so the film’s lack of depth feels especially disappointing.  She does not deserve all the blame, though; Michael R. Perry’s rather bland, unfunny script does not set the stage for her and the cast to succeed.

Not to mention, the humor of “The Voices” also falls victim to forces outside the movie.  Sartrapi obviously does not condone murder, but placing a character who commits them at the center of a story does make identification and sympathy much simpler.  By making Jerry the protagonist, the film does glorify his exploits to some small extent.  In a time where mentally disturbed people come unhinged and tear holes in communities like Aurora and Newtown, serving as a party to their crimes just feels inappropriate.  Laughing at them seemed downright wrong.  C+2stars





REVIEW: To the Wonder

8 02 2015

To the Wonder” is probably the most Malickian (is that the right word – or would it be Malicky?) film that Terrence Malick has directed to date.  And that is not necessarily a good thing.

Like Quentin Tarantino or Wes Anderson, Malick’s stylistic hallmarks have transcended merely serving their story.  They are a recognizable brand.  Malick is so avant-garde and experimental, however, that his brand lacks a lot of commercial appeal.  (Though plenty of young filmmakers shamelessly try to imitate him.)

“To the Wonder” plays like a guide to make a Malick movie, rote and rather passionless.  It boils down what makes him distinct as a director into a series of clichés.  The film documents scenes from a love triangle (as portrayed by Ben Affleck, Olga Kurylenko, and Rachel McAdams) as well as a few from a Catholic priest (Javier Bardem) that crosses their path at some point.  As usual with Malick, the engine moving everything forward is the philosophical and existential musings spewed by multiple narrators rather than a traditional “plot.”

Having voiceover from more than one person is not a problem, but “To the Wonder” stumbles by not firmly deciding on a main character or protagonist.  The film does not just feel unfocused; it feels remarkably undisciplined.  By not providing an entry point to the proceedings, Malick leaves his audience in a position on the outside looking in.

Granted, simply observing the film could be worse since “To the Wonder” is shot by Emmanuel Lubezki, the cinematographer behind iconoclastic films ranging from “The Tree of Life” to “Gravity” and “Birdman.”  While Lubezki hardly breaks boundaries or explores bold new territory here, even watching him on autopilot proves fascinating.  His technical proficiency combined with Malick’s eye for the beauty of nature makes for quite the dynamic duo.  They could even make a Sonic drive-in look magical – and in “To the Wonder,” they do just that.  C+2stars





REVIEW: Cave of Forgotten Dreams

7 02 2015

In his documentary “Cave of Forgotten Dreams,” Werner Herzog explores a cave in southern France with some of the oldest known examples of human painting.  Naturally, he tries to invoke a sense of majesty, and he often amplifies the impact of the prehistoric drawings with a wondrous classical score.  A part of me wonders if he and Terrence Malick swapped contacts on a music supervisor since the film sounds quite a bit like “The Tree of Life.”

All jokes aside, Herzog makes some excellent points about art history, development, and evolution by delving deeply into these murals.  These early cave dwellers showed a remarkable awareness of contrast and contour.  (Gazing at them reminded me of my own experience standing in front of the sprawling “La Guernica” by Pablo Picasso, which hangs in Madrid’s Reína Sofia.)  Herzog even argues that their depiction of legs with movement represents humanity’s first attempt at cinema.  After all, they are called motion pictures.

Perhaps some of the grandeur and spectacle was lost on me since I watched the film on my couch at home, not in Herzog’s preferred 3D.  But I felt the film, fascinating as it was, could have been sped up at times.  If “Cave of Forgotten Dreams” ran under an hour, then it could be easily consumed by a cultural anthropology course (a prime target audience) in one classic period.  B2halfstars





REVIEW: Into the Abyss

6 02 2015

Into the AbyssWhen people think of documentaries, they often remember the most boring or the most didactic ones.  For many, non-fiction film is about telling you exactly what happened or, in the minds of the documentarian, exactly what needs to happen.  Werner Herzog’s “Into the Abyss” is neither of these.

Herzog does what most filmmakers set out to do – that is, to tell a story.  It’s one of true crime, a triple homicide in Conroe, Texas, resulting from complications in the robbery of a red Camaro.  A decade after the crime resulted in a life sentence for one and a death sentence for another, Herzog retraces the story from the beginning and allows the events to unfold rather slowly but still grippingly.

“Into the Abyss” isn’t selling any sort of viewpoint or moral cause, unlike most documentaries on law and order.  Herzog is a rather extreme case of laying all the information out there and allow the viewer to come to their own conclusions.  Some might prefer it if their documentary shouted to them that they should deplore the death penalty.  But I rather like being left to my own devices to ponder the movie as so many documentaries make their message clear from the get-go and being instantly forgettable.

Herzog gathers interviews from pretty much everyone involved in the story: the family members of the deceased, the law enforcement officials on the murders, the two robbers-turned-murderers, and even the man who will deliver the lethal injection.  With all these viewpoints, there’s a sense of comprehensiveness to the tale.  I don’t think Herzog’s film is perfect, but there’s something refreshing in its straightforward approach that leaves all the slanting to be done by the viewer.  B2halfstars





F.I.L.M. of the Week (February 5, 2015)

5 02 2015

War WitchMany harrowing stories of child soldiers in Africa have found expression in art, exposing many Westerners to the ravages of the continent’s civil wars.  Few strike such a powerful and resonant emotional chord as Kim Nguyen’s “War Witch,” though.  This was one of the Academy’s five nominees for Best Foreign Language Film in 2012, and it is also my pick for the “F.I.L.M. of the Week” for the way it elevates discourse on its subject matter beyond victimization for the characters and easy pity for the audience.

Nguyen’s film, which he also wrote, tracks three years in the life of adolescent Komona (Rachel Mwanza, in a stunning debut performance) in sub-Saharan Africa.  Or, rather, Komona recounts them herself in a heartbreaking address to her unborn child.  When she foregrounds her life by stating, “I don’t know if God will give me the strength to love you,” Komona’s disembodied voice sets the stage for the depiction of some true horrors.

“War Witch” does not these nightmarish events in body count or in flowing carnage, however.  Nguyen shows his interest lies in exploring the emotional damage inflicted by the atrocities of war.  This is observable as early as the first time rebels force Komona to kill someone.  When she pulls the trigger, the camera stays fixated on her face alone.  If the film affords any attention at all to the life she took, it would be a hurried and unclear shot of the body as Komona runs away from it.

The movie mostly remains at that same level of anguish and distress, though Nguyen does allow for a few beautiful, tender moments.  “War Witch” is not about mysticism, but it finds a way to naturally incorporate its presence and influence into the proceedings.  The rebel leaders declare Komona, the improbable last person living from her village, a “war witch” since only the supernatural could explain her survival.  That status attracts the fondness of a young boy, the group’s “magician,” and his affection helps restore a small bit of hope for humanity.

But, sadly, “War Witch” is not a tender romance.  It is a film about the abominations of war, which Nguyen artistically renders with a sense of surrealism.  Often times, he takes away the soundtrack to a brutal act, simply leaving the image of what it is and nothing more.  Komona commits, and is often party to, these violent deeds, although she also suffers great losses because of them.  Her internal torment over these conflicting roles proves far more gut-wrenching than any other traumatic occurence in the movie (and “War Witch” has plenty of those to spare).





REVIEW: Wetlands

4 02 2015

WetlandsLet the record show that I am by no means an expert on foreign comedy since very little of it washes up on American shores.  Why is that, you ask?  To quote James Cameron, “As you go around the world, ideas of comedy change, ideas of beauty and romance change, but one man hitting another man plays the same way everywhere.”  So I speak only from knowledge of this side of the pond when I say that women are generally afforded fewer opportunities to be gross than men.

Seth Rogen sticks a probe up his butt in “The Interview” and no one thinks twice.  James Franco and Danny McBride verbally duel about ejaculation locations in “This Is The End” to nobody’s shock.  But when Melissa McCarthy dared to defecate in a sink during a hilarious scene in “Bridesmaids?”  It was, apparently, a watershed moment for women in comedy.  Talk about a gendered double standard.

If you think females should have the chance to go as nasty and coarse as their male counterparts in the name of a laugh, then the German writer/director David Wnendt’s “Wetlands” is a must-see.  The faint of heart or those with a working gag reflex might consider approaching with caution as something goes in and comes out of just about every orifice of its protagonist, Carla Juri’s Helen Memel.  She’s an odd, yet actually rather endearing, figure who relishes in shattering all social norms regarding sexuality.  That drive, unsurprisingly, leads to a number of zanily entertaining scenarios.

Yet, in spite of her unabashed unhygienic practices, Helen is mostly motivated by some rather sweet desires.  Above all, she wants her divorced parents to reunite; after that, the attention of an attractive male nurse attending to her after a freak accident involving hemorrhoids.  (That might slightly spoil the movie, but I think you also ought to know what you are getting yourself into by watching this movie.)

Without a genuine and likable guiding light, “Wetlands” might have played like a brutal taboo-breaking exercise that simply checked off potential offenses for the sake of checking them off.  But Wnendt makes them all serve a story, and it makes all the difference.  B2halfstars





REVIEW: The Guest

3 02 2015

The Guest

A new spate of American genre films that wear their influences on their sleeves often underwhelm.  After all, the downside of name-checking is having to weather comparisons to the source itself.  Adam Wingard’s “The Guest,” however, is the rare film from this revival that actually stands well on its own merits.

The plot could more or less be reduced to saying it’s “The Terminator” for the age of the Iraq-Afghanistan military industrial complex.  Dan Stevens stars as David Collins, the titular guest, a self-professed veteran who slyly ingratiates himself with the family of fallen comrade Caleb Peterson.  His stay just keeps extending due to the kindness of the Petersons and his insidiously winning charm.

Wingard plants the seeds of conflict and action in this idyllic sojourn of “The Guest.”  The movie jumps from a mostly dramatic piece to a tense thriller and then into an all-out action fest (whose ending nods cleverly to Stanley Kubrick’s “The Shining”).  Somewhat surprisingly, all these elements coexist rather well.  This is due in large part to Wingard allowing knowledge of cinephile cult classics to enhance the movie, not drive it altogether. It also helps that “The Guest” does not feel like a litany of references to his VHS collection circa 1993.

Wingard simply brings a fun amount of campy pulp to the table while also maintaining the movie’s integrity.  “The Guest” lands in the narrow strip between parody and believability.  It is serious enough to command and maintain attention without being so serious that it precludes a great, enjoyable time.  And that throbbing synth-pop score underneath it all?  Just icing on the cake.  B+3stars





REVIEW: Pride

2 02 2015

Perhaps the most tragic dissonance in film occurs when ideology and filmmaking prowess fail to match.  Say what you will about the frightening Nazi propaganda of Leni Riefenstahl’s “The Triumph of the Will,” but the picture is undeniably well-made.  More recently, “The Homesman” and “Big Eyes” offered appealing feminist viewpoints, yet both were rather tediously assembled.

Matthew Warchus’ film “Pride” details the unlikely coalition between British miners and LGBT activists to protest the destructive policies of the Thatcher administration.  These are good people fighting for what they think is right, so the natural reaction would be wanting to support them.  But, overall, the film fails to capture the swelling spirit of a fellow progressively minded film like Gus Van Sant’s “Milk.”

It is not a particularly enlightening look at the nature of successful activism.  It lack insight into discrimination and homophobia on both the institutional and the individual level.  It does not provide any strong emotional pull towards a character (though the story of closeted Joe embracing his identity has some touching moments).  Although, I will say, seeing Imelda Staunton (best known as Dolores Umbridge from “Harry Potter”) breaking it down at a gay club was quite a sight.

I simply watched “Pride.”  I did not feel it.  C2stars





REVIEW: Escape from Tomorrow

31 01 2015

Escape from Tomorrow

Because Disney would never allow the filming of a nightmarish horror film on the grounds of its theme parks, Randy Moore had to shoot his film “Escape from Tomorrow” covertly.  The cast and crew, in order to avoid detection, remained practically indistinguishable from the average guest and their usual accoutrements.  The construction of the film is laudable, but too bad the final product turned out so lackluster.

As much as I wanted to admire and embrace the brashness of Moore’s guerilla filmmaking techniques, the story was just too generic and banal to engage on any level.  The 90 minutes of “Escape from Tomorrow” hardly feel like an escape from reality or even a mildly productive use of time.  They feel like the 90 minutes you can expect to wait in line for a ride at a Disney property; the only question worth asking is, “When will it be over?!”

Moore aims for surrealism with his filmmaking, yet it winds up feeling like he just completed a “Baby’s First David Lynch” kit.  Some of that might stem from the lackluster technology and less than ideal shooting circumstances, although he is certainly not helped by thinly-sketched characters running through a litany of tired scenarios.  Family vacations, job loss, marital tension, potentially unstable mind, a dash of magical realism … been there, done that.  No amount of brash production tactics can bail out a bad story, and “Escape from Tomorrow” even has brashness to spare.  C2stars





REVIEW: Project Nim

30 01 2015

Director James Marsh won an Oscar for combining archival footage, recreations, and present-day interviews around Phillipe Petain’s tightrope walk between the Twin Towers in “Man on Wire.”  (Good luck to Robert Zemeckis and Joseph Gordon-Levitt in their attempt to top it with their fictional “The Walk.”)  His documentary follow-up, “Project Nim,” plays more by the standard rulebooks, but it still works remarkably well.

The film follows a strange cast of characters surrounding one chimp named Nim who researchers believed could develop the capacity for language if raised like a human child.  The experiment occurs in the 1970s, and it naturally draws some very curious players from more radical countercultural and hippie circles.  Their experiment raises some fascinating questions as it progress, most of which relate to our own humanity and what separates and distinguishes us as a species.

Getting to those head-scratchers, though, proves a little more emotionally engaging for unconventional reasons.  Marsh is obliged to stay faithful to the events that transpired, although that does not make watching the cringeworthy actions of some of the participants any more palatable.  As many act in manners that are at best ill-advised and at worst completely unethical, “Project Nim” becomes just as much an exercise for the jaw (which will often hit the ground in awe) as for the brain.  Marsh ought to receive special commendation for somehow maintaining neutrality when talking to people who thought it was acceptable to give drugs and sexual stimulation to a chimp.  B+3stars





F.I.L.M. of the Week (January 29, 2015)

29 01 2015

FreewayI would count myself a big fan of actress Reese Witherspoon (see my personal anecdotes on my middle school crush in Random Factoids #49 and #88), yet I somehow managed to only learn of the existence of “Freeway” in 2015.  This film stars a younger Witherspoon as Vanessa Lutz, the daughter of a prostitute who has to do and say some unmentionables in the name of self-preservation and survival in a gritty urban environment.  She goes to prison, not to visit a client like Elle Woods but actually as an inmate.

This 1996 oddity might not fit Witherspoon’s squeaky-clean sweet Southern belle image, but it certainly gives her something out of the ordinary.  This modern retelling of the Little Red Riding Hood fairytale is a peculiar burst of energy from writer/director Matthew Bright, who has since done relatively little of note.  But his debut feature is my pick for the “F.I.L.M. of the Week” because it never holds back in its peculiar assessment of American culture as seen from the vantage point of its underbelly.

Witherspoon quickly asserts her pluckiness in “Freeway,” chaining up her social worker in order to seek refuge from her long-last grandmother.  On the way, however, she gets drawn into the clutches of the conniving serial killer Bob Wolverton.  Keifer Sutherland plays his wolf not as big and bad, but rather as eerily unsettling and deceptively meek.  (That was basically the mold of the ’90s murderer, so it makes sense.)

Somewhere on the path to grandmother’s house, “Freeway” changes up the script.  The film’s Little Red takes a step into the big leagues by gaining a welcome sense of agency, taking the film on an unexpected detour into courtrooms, prisons, and a trial by media.  The changes ought to prompt some stimulating discussion about what is and is not still relevant from the old tale.  By transplanting Little Red Riding Hood into modern society, rather than simply tweaking her story in a mythic milieu like “Into the Woods,” “Freeway” invites a freer dialogue.

Interestingly, when I went back to read reviews from the time of release, most critics reacted to the film as a satire.  “Freeway” still maintains a sense of exaggeration, sure, but it has lost a bit of shock after years of reality TV highlighting such unique specimens as Honey Boo-Boo, the Jersey Shore, and the Duck Dynasty family.  Nearly two decades after its Sundance premiere, though, its gentle mockery of the strange corners of America still entertains and excites.  Much of the film’s bite today comes from Witherspoon, who once again seems willing to explore these rough edges of her persona in “Wild” and beyond.





REVIEW: Don Jon

28 01 2015

Don JonFor all those who might have found Steve McQueen’s sex addiction drama “Shame” too intense in either content or form, Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s comedic “Don Jon” may provide the perfect vehicle for discussing the same issues.  The film acknowledges many of the ills facing men in the age of internet pornography, such as the objectification of women and the notion that sexual satisfactions is deliverable on demand at the leisure of a Google search.

“Don Jon” will prove enlightening for anyone who has never thought deeply about masturbatory pleasures, especially because Gordon-Levitt’s script telegraphs his social commentary through heavy-handed voiceovers from his lead character Jon.  Anyone who has ever taken anything more than psychology or sociology 101 is likely to find the film’s observations shallow and skin-deep.  But if it gets people talking and consciously reconsidering their habits, then the movie at least serves some purpose.

And in case someone tunes out during Jon’s long-winded (and perhaps somewhat implausibly aware) confessionals on his porn addiction, the plot also effectively echoes the simple yet important message.  Though the womanizing, GTL-exuding Jon lands a smoking hot girlfriend Barbara (Scarlett Johansson), she quickly flees once she discovers the extent of his dirty secret and leaves Jon a wreck.  Only when he heeds the learned wisdom of Julianne Moore’s middle-aged Esther, who reminds him that sex is about satisfying two people, can he regain the same pleasure in the orgasm.

Though “Don Jon” may not speak fluently on matters on sexuality, Gordon-Levitt certainly understands gender politics quite well.  The film really nails some of what needs to change in our current conception of masculinity, and he begins to tackle the way that females reinforce that.  At one point while shopping, Barbara insists that Jon cannot, as a man, clean his own house because it clashes with the performance of manliness that she expects.  That, unfortunately, proves the extent of glancing at the other side of the gender divide, yet there is always time to explore further.  Gordon-Levitt ought to make a “Don Joan” movie to examine femininity as well since a little too much was left on the table in “Don Jon.”  B2halfstars





REVIEW: Computer Chess

27 01 2015

Computer ChessWriter and director Andrew Bujalski is largely credited with sparking the mumblecore movement in film.  This style of filmmaking aims to capture life as it is really lived, with all the sputtering and mumbling we do in the process of fumbling to communicate.

Bujalski released his watershed “Funny Ha Ha” in 2002, before digital filmmaking technology became truly and fully democratized.  Now, anyone with a camera – which is basically anyone with a phone – can create a film with the kind of naturalistic style that was previously so rare in the cinema.  The challenge for Bujalski and fellow mumblecore adherents is to remain relevant in the era of YouTube and self-distribution channels.  Far more so than a decade ago, they have to make the case for why their stories matter and deserve 90 minutes of our time more than something else.

That is precisely the stumbling block of “Computer Chess,” which just never really presents a strong rationale for the act of watching it.  To be clear, Bujalski most certainly has a better eye for aesthetics than the average Joe Schmo.  His film, set at a 1980 computer conference, captures the dominant analog videotape look of the time down to the difficulty with keeping images in focus.  It also boasts a few intellectually stimulating conversations about artificial intelligence, demonstrating that some clear thought went into making the film.

But overall, “Computer Chess” just proves a little too obtuse to really connect.  There is not much of a story to follow, and the film lacks any strongly developed characters with whom any rapport can form.  The experience gets boring after about 10 minutes once the general purpose of the cinematic endeavor makes itself clear.  Afterwards, finding any reason to care constitutes a herculean task.  C2stars





REVIEW: Room 237

26 01 2015

Room 237Aside from showing how far the “fair use” exemption of American copyright can be extended, Rodney Ascher’s unique documentary “Room 237” is a film that demonstrates how the cult of auteurism has run amuck to its point of logical absurdity.  The cinephiles and film analysts he spotlights stretch the theory that a director is responsible for every detail in every frame almost to farcical extremes.

The images of Ascher’s documentary, or potentially a feature-length video essay, come entirely from Stanley Kubrick’s cult classic horror film “The Shining” (as well as a few of his other films to play the part of B-roll).  The words are all provided by five people convinced they know the secret meaning underlying every minute of that film.  Depending on which one of them you ask, “The Shining” is really about sexuality, the Holocaust, the genocide of Native Americans, the entirety of the human family, history’s collective amnesia, or even an apology for faking the moon landing.

Each interviewee has to adopt a certain attitude to how playful or serious Kubrick was in his crafting of the film, selectively pulling from film criticism to make their arguments irrefutable.  All seem to agree, however, that Kubrick is infallible, completely incapable of making a continuity error, mistake or oversight.  Nothing could be chalked up to coincidence, for Kubrick oversaw every speck in every frame.  A so-called “impossible window” could not possibly a snafu given that there were two different sets for the film.

Read the rest of this entry »