No matter your opinion on director Tim Burton, it can’t be denied that the man has some true creativity. This spark is what gained him notoriety in the late ’80s and early ’90s with hits like “Beetlejuice,” “Edward Scissorhands,” and “The Nightmare Before Christmas.” Recently, however, Burton has seemed to have found that creativity isn’t always synonymous with originality, and has mainly spent the past five years retooling other people’s work.
But while Burton puts his own unique spin on these projects, I have felt that each of them has lost a very distinct part of their original identity. With his remake of “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory,” the movie lost most of its original charm and fun. His film adaptation of “Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street” dropped a sizable portion of Stephen Sondheim’s songs, and the story lost a great deal of character development.
Unfortunately, “Alice in Wonderland” falls into the same pattern. This time, Burton has stripped the movie of a lot of its sense. Granted, this is a fairly non-sensical story, so this isn’t the worst movie to receive this treatment. But Burton makes it lose even the most basic coherency, and no movie can be excused for that.
It’s hard to describe what exactly Burton’s take on “Alice in Wonderland” actually is. It is not a remake of the Disney animated classic like I assumed it would be. But it is not any sort of sequel, prequel, revamping, or modernizing of anything we have ever seen. This version is just off in its own little world, reminding us of our favorite characters but never giving us any reason to fall in love with them again.






They Commented...SO SHOULD YOU!