REVIEW: The Boys Are Back

25 07 2010

I saw “The Boys Are Back” a few months ago, and I remember as much about it now as I did the day after I saw it.  If that doesn’t speak volumes about this ultimately forgettable movie, I don’t know what does.

The plot revolves around a widower played by Clive Owen who takes on an interesting parenting philosophy: no rules.  As a sports journalist, he traveled quite a bit and never really had much practical parenting experience.  So his strategy gets a serious test, particularly when he invites his son from a prior marriage to come live with him in Australia.  This proves to be just enough to keep us from counting down the minutes until the movie is over but not enough to fully engage.

Really, the movie’s only talking point is Clive Owen.  He’s a fantastic actor who has given some riveting performances, particularly in “Children of Men” and “Closer.”  Owen won a Golden Globe and received an Oscar nomination for the latter, and I think it’s just a matter of time before he nets the industry’s most coveted prize.  He gives a respectable performance here, showing a tender side he usually hides.  The previously mentioned roles were both hardened, gruff characters that Owen nailed with a stone-faced tenacity.

He’s not bad at the lighter fluff, but he needs to get back to his comfort zone to further elevate his status.  It’s pretty obvious that “The Boys Are Back” is a half-hearted attempt at awards bait.   You would think it’s the kind of role that might garner some serious attention and then laurels.  But the movie isn’t flashy in the slightest, and Owen has practically no opportunities to show what a talented actor he is.  So for now, we can dream about the day that Owen sinks his teeth into the career-defining role.  Until then, we’re stuck with this.  B- /


Actions

Information

5 responses

25 07 2010
Simon/Ripley

This movie. Is so. Vanilla.

25 07 2010
CMrok93

Looked very, very, very cheesy and predictable. I hate to say it.

28 07 2010
rtm

I saw and reviewed this a while ago. I like it more than you, though your grade for it sounds fair. I was curious to see Owen’s tender side, I suppose you could say he played against type here, and I think he pulled it off.

“But the movie isn’t flashy in the slightest, and Owen has practically no opportunities to show what a talented actor he is.” Y’know, I feel the opposite. The fact that the movie isn’t flashy makes it more dependent on the actors’ performances, especially the lead. The scenes between him and his kids did tug my heartstrings, and the gorgeous scenery of South Australia countryside is a nice bonus.

28 07 2010
Marshall

See, I just felt no emotional hold from the movie. Owen was fine; it just wasn’t anything special.

30 07 2010
Aiden R.

Saw this months ago and have yet to write to the review because I just can’t bring to myself to churn out 600 words on how blah it is. Beautiful scenery though, I’ll give it that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: