“Fair Game” has all but disappeared from discussion in the awards race, which really is a shame. In my review last month, I raved:
“What makes ‘Fair Game’ one of the best movies I’ve seen this year is the fact that it is a politically conscious movie but not necessarily politically charged. It’s a movie that reminds us that the truth has no political affiliation, and it reaffirms the very American responsibility to stand up and voice our discontent when we see the government failing in its duties. Naomi Watt’s Valerie Plame Wilson does this in spite of one of the worst political climates for dissent in our history, and it’s a rousing profile in courage that will reinforce your sense of patriotic duty.”
Back in the Oscar Moment before I saw the movie, I was optimistically cynical about the movie’s chances, writing:
“For the movie to have a shot at Best Picture, there needs to be some big buzz building around the opening to carry it through the season. It received mostly positive marks from its Cannes debut, but no one was jumping out of their seat in excitement. Emerging from the Bush era, ‘Fair Game’ takes a look at how far we were willing to let the government take our freedom in exchange for security – and the victims of such policies. It’s not a sympathetic look at America, and neither was last year’s Best Picture winner ‘The Hurt Locker.’ Are the politics of Oscar entering an era of confronting harsh realities?”
Over a month after the movie’s release, we haven’t seen any fireworks. It was certified fresh on Rotten Tomatoes, but its score in the 70s wasn’t exactly a game changer. It didn’t exactly get a large platform release, but it scored fairly modestly even in just over 400 theaters with $8 million and counting.
So, does it still have a chance? Back in October and November, you seemed to think so. 2 voters said yes, and 1 voter said no. I’d have to say that unless some massive late surge comes for the movie, we are looking at an also-ran. A very good also-ran, though.
Leave a Reply