Full Frame Documentary Film Festival
Matthew Heineman’s documentary “Cartel Land” follows a real-life David and Goliath story, as its participants describe their struggle. The average Mexican civilians, even as a collective force, are rendered puny by the behemoth of the drug cartels that pervade every corner of their society.
So enter Dr. Jose Mireles, stage right. He’s a working man just like any other who gets mad as hell and decides not to take it anymore. Since the Mexican constitution states that power derives from the people, Mireles decides to reclaim that right as the head of vigilante group Autodefensas. The militia manages to gain some serious traction in towns located in the southern province of Michocán, driving out the entrenched cartels.
But “Cartel Land” asks, at what cost? In order to reestablish order in the region, the Autodefensas become increasingly militaristic themselves and thus relatively indistinguishable from the threat they tried to eliminate. When it comes to examining the vicious cycle of violence begetting more violence, Heineman knocks the ball out of the park.
Where he falters, though, is jumping back across the border to shine a spotlight on an American vigilante group. The Arizona Border Recon, run by a deluded patriot, seeks to stop undocumented migrants from crossing the border. In order to rustle up support, they rely on appeals that range from racially coded language to outright racism.
What function the Arizona Border Recon is supposed to serve in “Cartel Land” escapes me. Perhaps they were supposed to be a reference group to make the Autodefensas look more sane? Any other connection between the vigilantes is tenuous at best since such a wide distance separates them geographically.
Mireles and the Autodefensas get the lion’s share of screen time, as they should. The group is more relevant to the central concern of the film, and they are more interesting anyways. Every time Tim “Nailer” Foley and his band of self-appointed border patrol agents show up on screen, they just disrupt the narrative flow and dilute the effectiveness of the documentary on the whole. B- / 
Marshall and the Movies 
Did this critic see the same doc film that I saw or was he/she on meth courtesy of the drug cartel during the screening?
I certainly hope we saw the same film! I saw this at a doc festival within 24 hours of a lesser hyped documentary on the same subject, so I think that might be the cause of my reaction that swung a little farther from critical consensus.
Racism? Wanting to protect the border is racism? The Mexicans have a wall on their southern border, and strictly enforce their immigration laws. I guess they’re racist too? Or maybe you’re just not very intelligent? I love the use of “undocumented migrants.” They’re ILLEGAL aliens. Stop the PC crap. Its destroying this country.
Hi Jeremy, thank you for taking the time to comment on the post. Unfortunately, this documentary has faded into the back of my memory (because I saw two more in rapid succession after it at the festival), so I really cannot recall the precise phrase that in my mind seemed dripping with prejudice. But the vigilante group often engaged in rhetoric that I found to be rather dehumanizing and trading on stereotypes that “Cartel Land” proves to be largely without merit in its Mexican segments.
As for my use of the term “undocumented migrants,” I would encourage you to look at this post that might somehow illuminate my use of the term: http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2013/01/30/170677880/in-immigration-debate-undocumented-vs-illegal-is-more-than-just-semantics
Just out of curiosity, where was my review posted this evening? Curious as to where all these redirects are coming from.