The concept behind “In Time” is actually fairly interesting, and maybe that’s why I was willing to overlook some of the film’s shortcomings. In a dystopian ultra-classist 2169, people stop aging at 25, and living any longer than that requires you to literally buy time. Extra time seems to come from just one extra strong and special handshake.
Such a kind of transfer begs the question of why people don’t just go steal it from the rich people why they sleep. Or why people don’t just use tight grips or shake with superglue. Needless to say, the broad strokes of inspiration blinded writer/director Andrew Niccol to the many plot holes in this world.
Watching the movie from a post-Occupy world certainly highlights this extreme case of social inequity as the rich live forever and the poor die young. From my sociology classes in college, I can tell you that inequality is corrosive for society and poverty is quite literally a lethal force. “In Time” is very conscious of these things and holds an interesting mirror up to the audience watching the film.
Sadly, that mirror is fogged up by some sloppy storytelling and a plot that ultimately can’t sustain beyond the novelty of the “time as life” concept. The characterization is decent, but the cast of good looking actors who can still pass for 25 – including Justin Timberlake, Amanda Seyfried, Cillian Murphy, Olivia Wilde, Matt Bomer, and Alex Pettyfer – don’t do much to elevate the material. The intelligence of the social commentary ultimately gives way to a fairly standard action film, but the themes raised in the beginning are enough to make me feel that “In Time” was not entirely wasted time. B- /
Can I get a collective “WHOOP WHOOP” for my return from the first month of college hiatus? [pause] If any of you all are still out there (doubtful), you can be louder! So I’ll need you to comment (shameless plug for commenting).
While I’m on my winning streak of humor, I’ll funnel this goodwill into making you read my post about what to look forward to in October. Reviews will be coming soon for “50/50,” “Drive,” and “Warrior” with hopes that I’ll find time to squeeze in “The Debt,” “Contagion,” and “Moneyball” somehow between classes, homework, and a social life of sorts.
October is my probably my favorite month of the year, not just for the selfish reason that it’s my month of birth. It’s a great month to be outside; I’m especially excited this year that I will be out of Texas and in a place where I can experience fall and changing seasons. It’s also a time of changing seasons at your movie theater, out with summer leftovers and slightly dumpy September fare and in with late-year commercial fare and some early awards plays. Here’s what 2011 has to offer us in the month of October:
October 7
The best of the month may come in its first weekend with “The Ides of March,” a political thriller written, produced, and directed by George Clooney, who also puts in some time in front of the camera. The real star is Ryan Gosling as a campaign manager torn between opposing sides of a presidential race. The movie will surely have important and relevant implications for the way that the modern campaign is run and will no doubt be a major player in the Oscar race this year. Even if it’s just an early check on your best of 2011 laundry list, this has to be a must-see for every cinephile.
Meanwhile, “Real Steel” … yeah, can’t say I have the highest of hopes for that. “Transformers” already gave me plenty of clanging metal this year.
On the other side of the tracks, there’s Juno Temple in “Dirty Girl,” a story of sexual mores in 1987 Oklahoma. It stars Juno Temple, who will have a role in “The Dark Knight Rises,” so it may be worthwhile to see just to say you knew who she was before her breakout (if indeed she does do that).
In case you haven’t had enough Jessica Chastain this year between “The Debt,” “The Help,” and “The Tree of Life,” she also appears in “Texas Killing Fields,” which – no offense to the talent involved – looks like one of those C-list movies you’d find on the “just added” section of Netflix streaming between “Tangled” and “The Expendables.”
This weekend also brings a strange extreme with “The Human Centipede 2: Full Sequence,” which looks to overcome the sequel slump by presenting a story of life imitating art (if you want to call the gross-out horror film that shocked audiences last year art). It’s a must for sadists and horror fanatics; others would do best to just stay home.
October 14
This Friday marks my birthday … and Hollywood celebrates by releasing two remakes and a Jack Black comedy. Mental confetti just splattered the walls of my brain.
“Men of a Certain Age” gets a big-screen adaptation after cancellation – but directed by “The Devil Wears Prada” (I’m actually being serious here) – as two aging Frat Pack comedians and the guy who has hosted “Saturday Night Live” the second most times in history go on a trip to fight their ennui by taking a trip in “The Big Year.” Wait, maybe this is a remake …
Meanwhile, ’80s nostalgia runs rampant as “Footloose” and “The Thing” both get updated. Note to bloggers/columnists: the question “Why aren’t the originals sufficient?” has been asked and answered dozens of times before.
Off the mainstream, “Trespass” begs the question of whether or not the Academy can revoke Nicolas Cage’s Oscar. But on a more positive note, one of my favorite modern directors, Pedro Almodóvar, is back with his latest film, “The Skin I Live In.” It didn’t get the strongest reviews out of Cannes, but it looks haunting and beautiful. Plus, I’ll see just about anything he makes.
October 21
I’m legally prohibited from sharing any thoughts on “Martha Marcy May Marlene” until it hits theaters in Houston – but for now, enjoy the trailer. And if you are really that curious about the movie, listen to “Marcy’s Song,” a tune from John Hawkes that plays briefly at the end.
How many times can we remake “The Three Musketeers?” I’m calling it now that in 2022, the kids from “Slumdog Millionaire” will star as Athos, Porthos, and whatever Jamal’s final guess was. Last year’s October release “Secretariat” gets remade for 2011 as “The Mighty Macs,” this time featuring the woman ahead of her time as a college basketball coach. “Paranormal Activity 3” gets slightly creative as it goes back to the origins of the horror from the original, but it’s still a sell-out.
On the indie circuit, “Margin Call” boasts a quasi-“Contagion” level of prestige but doesn’t seem to be generating much buzz. I guess that post-“Inside Job” and “Too Big to Fail,” recession backstories may be old and tired.
October 28
One of my biggest pet peeves is hearing about amazing movies that play at Sundance in January and then having to wait to see them until the end of the year. Hopefully my patience will be rewarded with “Like Crazy,” the movie that everyone emerged from the festival talking about. Felicity Jones and Anton Yelchin are two hot talents rising in the industry; hopefully this catches on with the mainstream and helps their careers skyrocket.
“In Time” could be an interesting mix of high-octane popcorn blockbuster and political allegory … or the trailer just gave off false notions. I’ll have to hover over this one for a little while before deciding what my schedule for seeing it is.
The director of “2012” and “Independence Day” is making a movie with Oscar buzz?! In what world do we live now? Might as well check out “Anonymous” … apparently Rhys Ifan’s performance is startlingly good.
I wasn’t a big fan of “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas,” but “The Rum Diary” just looks like Hunter S. Thompson light. Even with Johnny Depp back, this doesn’t look like it can drum up a lot of enthusiasm. Speaking of not drumming up a lot of enthusiasm, how about “Johnny English Reborn?” Waiting 8 years between installments doesn’t do you a lot of good when the original didn’t do particularly well.
So, are you more excited that I’m back burning up the blogosphere or that October is coming soon? Take the poll, leave a comment, do whatever – but make your voice heard!
Marshall and the Movies 
Recent Comments