Well, folks, if you had any doubt that Oscar season was here before this week, you can’t now. Nearly every critics group chimed in with their best of the year, and we got two massively important nominations lists from the Golden Globes and the Screen Actors Guild. The puzzle is really starting to come together, and since there was so much going on, the format of the last two weeks just didn’t really work.
In place of the usual “here’s the group, here’s what they selected” rambling, I decided to issue a new set of predictions based on what we saw over the past week.
A few notes before I begin: there’s no poll this week, and I’m debating whether or not to include one at all from here on out because there has been so little participation. Also, please click the links! I spend a lot of time linking the titles of movies to other posts I’ve written that might be of interest. The first time I mention a movie, it links to the trailer on YouTube. The second mention goes to my Oscar Moment on the movie. The third mention goes to my review, if applicable.
Past predictions: Early December 2010, November 2010, September 2010.
Best Picture:
The Social Network
- The King’s Speech
- The Fighter
(7)
- Inception
- Black Swan
(3)
- Toy Story 3
(5)
- The Kids Are All Right
(10)
- Winter’s Bone
- True Grit
- 127 Hours
(6)
No change in my top 10, but some big trends have emerged. It’s clear that “The Social Network” is the critics’ group darling of 2010. Do you want me to name all the cities and organizations who named it their Best Picture? I’m proud to say my own city of Houston named it theirs (updated on Saturday). Ok, here’s the list:
- African-American Film Critics
- Boston Society of Film Critics
- Dallas-Fort Worth Film Critics Association
- Detroit Film Critics Society
- Houston Film Critics Society
- Indiana Film Journalists Association
- Las Vegas Film Critics Society
- Los Angeles Film Critics Association
- New York Film Critics Circle
- New York Film Critics Online
- San Francisco Film Critics Circle
- Southeastern Film Critics Association
- Toronto Film Critics Association
- Washington, D.C. Area Film Critics Association
In addition, it picked up nominations from nods from critics in Chicago, St. Louis, and Phoenix who have yet to announce their winners. On top of the previous win from the National Board of Review, “The Social Network” clearly has a ton of heat heading into the home stretch. It received 6 Golden Globe nominations including Best Picture (Drama), 9 Critics Choice Award (BFCA) nominations including Best Picture, and 2 Screen Actors Guild (SAG) Award nominations including Best Ensemble, their version of Best Picture. Critics make a difference, but they don’t decide Best Picture. It helps, though, that it won top prize from the incredibly influential film centers of New York and Los Angeles.
However, “The King’s Speech” set itself up for a second-stage surge by scoring more nominations than “The Social Network” at all three of the major groups that announced this week. It received 7 Golden Globe nominations, the most of any movie in 2010, including Best Picture. It received 11 BFCA nominations including Best Picture. It received 4 SAG Award nominations, tied for the most of any movie in 2010, including Best Ensemble.
These voters are not necessarily like critics in their taste, and it would only take a win of one of these big awards to hoist Tom Hooper’s film to the top spot. I wouldn’t be surprised to see it win the Globe for Best Picture simply because they almost always choose the most nominated movie. Then again, that strategy didn’t work out in 2008 when “Slumdog Millionaire” with 4 nominations triumphed over the pack leader “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” with 5 nominations. “Slumdog” swept the critics awards that year, so there could be an interesting parallel forming.
But for me, one of the big stories of the week was the emergence of “The Fighter” as a serious contender. We had heard good things, but most called it somewhat predictable and formulaic. No one was jumping up and down with joy, yet we saw an unprecedented outpouring of support this week. It received 6 BFCA nominations including Best Picture, 4 SAG Award nominations, tied for the most of 2010, including Best Ensemble, and 6 Golden Globe nominations including Best Picture. I got a chance to catch the movie this week, and it’s feel-good surface could make it a dark horse to watch out for in the race.
Then again, so could “Inception,” which picked up 4 Golden Globe nominations including Best Picture, something Christopher Nolan’s “The Dark Knight” couldn’t do back in 2008. It has also been a staple on the critics circuit, although taking second fiddle to “The Social Network” of course. The summer blockbuster has been a part of every top 5 or 10, practically the only certainty outside of a movie not involving Facebook. With 10 BFCA nominations as well, it could make a play for Best Picture as well. It could easily wind up the most nominated film of 2010 at the Oscars given its impressive technical aspects.
“Black Swan” is also making strides in the race, scoring a record 12 nominations from the BFCA, 4 nominations from the Golden Globes including Best Picture, and 3 SAG Award nominations including Best Ensemble. The box office has helped too, and as it expands into more theaters, expect it to be the audience favorite art-house movie. I think it’s got to be a shoo-in for a nomination now, although the win will be tricky given the subject matter.
“The Kids Are All Right” goes up thanks to its great showing with the New York Film Critics Circle, winning more categories than “The Social Network,” and receiving 4 Golden Globe nominations including Best Picture (Musical/Comedy) as well as 3 SAG Award nominations including Best Ensemble. It had a big miss with the BFCA, though, failing to score a Best Picture nomination. It should easily win the Globe for Best Picture, and the prospects are looking much better than they did last week. But I’m still not entirely certain that it’s going to get an Oscar nomination…
“Winter’s Bone” continues to stride nicely towards a Best Picture nomination, notable for being the only movie to win a Best Picture prize from a critics group other than “The Social Network” (kudos to San Diego for the originality). It missed with the Golden Globes, but they rarely delve THAT indie.
Slipping this week are “True Grit” and “127 Hours,” neither of which found much love from the Golden Globes. The former was completely shut out while the latter received three nominations but not for Best Picture or Director. The one-man show was unlikely to score a SAG nomination apart from Franco, but “True Grit” missed big by not receiving a Best Ensemble nomination given its star-studded cast. They did manage to score with the BFCA, both receiving a nomination for Best Picture. “True Grit” received 11 total nominations from the group while “127 Hours” scored an impressive 8. Neither look very strong at this stage, and if there are going to be any surprises on nomination morning, it could come at the expense of these two movies.
Worth noting: all movies predicted (with the exception of “The King’s Speech” because it was ineligible) appeared on the American Film Institute’s Top 10 films of the year. Ben Affleck’s “The Town” was also included.
Best Director:
David Fincher, “The Social Network”
- Christopher Nolan, “Inception”
(4)
- Darren Aronofsky, “Black Swan”
- Tom Hooper, “The King’s Speech”
(2)
- David O. Russell, “The Fighter”
(NR)
Dropping off: Danny Boyle
Barring some massive surge of appreciation for the boldness of Nolan or Aronofsky’s work this year, Fincher has this in the bag simply because he’s the only prior nominee with his eyes on the prize and he deserves it. (Nolan took home Best Director from the African-American Critics Association and the Indiana Film Journalists Association, and Aronofsky won with San Diego and San Francisco critics.)
Tom Hooper moves down because the actors are the star of the campaign, not him. Since so few people know of him and his other movies, there’s no rush to recognize him.
Boyle departs the list this week as love for “127 Hours” has grown soft, replaced with reservations by David O. Russell. Given that he’s not the most popular man in Hollywood, it’s going to be hard for him to score a nomination. But if the love for “The Fighter” continues, the goodwill could push him into the race.
Best Actor:
- Colin Firth, “The King’s Speech”
- Jesse Eisenberg, “The Social Network”
(3)
- James Franco, “127 Hours”
(2)
- Mark Wahlberg, “The Fighter”
(NR)
- Ryan Gosling, “Blue Valentine”
Dropping off: Robert Duvall
Firth still stands steadfast at the top amidst all. He has made a decent showing with the critics, winning top marks from Detroit, San Francisco, Washington D.C., the Southeastern critics, and the incredibly important groups in New York and Los Angeles, both of which chose “The Social Network” as their Best Picture. If all else fails, he should be the one way the Academy knows they can reward “The King’s Speech.”
But the real story of the season so far is massive surge of love for Jesse Eisenberg, whose performance in “The Social Network” could easily have been overlooked due to his age. That has not been the case so far as Eisenberg has dominated the critics circuit, winning top prizes from Boston, Houston, and Toronto in addition to taking the first prize of the year from the National Board of Review. If the movie starts dominating everything in its path a la “Slumdog Millionaire,” Eisenberg could surprise and win.
Yet James Franco has won more awards on the critics circuit, taking the prize from Dallas-Fort Worth, Indiana, Las Vegas, and the New York Film Critics Online. This is the kind of performance that the critics really love, and its adulation from this corner doesn’t necessarily translate to Oscar gold. Apparently a lot of people simply won’t watch the movie because they are scared (which is a terrible reason), and the overall buzz for the movie has plummeted thanks to that and Fox Searchlight’s clumsy release strategy.
Firth, Eisenberg, and Franco are all locks at this moment, their status solidified by appearing on nearly every Best Actor shortlist including from the BFCA, Golden Globes, and SAG Awards. After that, there are essentially four actors vying for the final two slots – Jeff Bridges, Robert Duvall, Ryan Gosling, and Mark Wahlberg. The first two are the conservative picks; the last two are riskier.
Bridges and Duvall both received nominations from the SAG Awards and the BFCA but were overlooked by the Golden Globes. The SAG is usually a good indicator of the Academy’s ultimate selections, but they are also notorious for getting sentimental for older actors. Given the tepid support for “True Grit” and the absence of support for “Get Low,” I don’t know if the Academy can justify to itself the inclusion of two prior winners in movies they didn’t really like.
Mark Wahlberg, a prior nominee for 2006’s “The Departed,” only managed to score a nomination from the Golden Gloves and a win from the African-American Film Critics Association, but the surge for “The Fighter” bodes well for his chances despite missing nods from the BFCA and the SAG Awards. The leading actor usually gets swept along for the ride in scenarios like these, and that feels likely for Wahlberg. However, since the heart of the film is Christian Bale, not leading man Wahlberg, he could still be overlooked.
And then there’s Ryan Gosling, Best Actor nominee in 2006 for “Half Nelson,” whose raw performance I still keep in my top 5. There are two interesting trajectories Gosling has taken through awards season: in 2006, he was nominated by the BFCA but snubbed by the Golden Globes and SAG Awards on the way to an Oscar nomination. In 2007, his work in “Lars and the Real Girl” was recognized by all three organizations yet not nominated by the Academy. “Blue Valentine” is an entirely different path, as Gosling was nominated by the BFCA and Golden Globes but not by the SAG Awards. I have faith … for now.
Best Actress:
- Natalie Portman, “Black Swan”
- Annette Bening, “The Kids Are All Right”
- Jennifer Lawrence, “Winter’s Bone”
(4)
- Michelle Williams, “Blue Valentine”
(5)
- Nicole Kidman, “Rabbit Hole”
(3)
No change in my top 5 this week as the same four actresses – Portman, Bening, Lawrence, Kidman – seeming to dominate the circuit collected nominations from the BFCA, the SAG Awards, and the Golden Globes. Unfortunately, due to the conflicting genre of their movies, we won’t get a Bening/Portman face-off at the latter ceremony. (And as a note, Kidman is at #5 because I just don’t think she will win. I see her as the Helen Mirren in “The Last Station” of 2010, a prior winner collecting every nomination but never with a real shot to win.)
I’m still picking Portman as I feel her performance is too good to be denied, and the love for “Black Swan” is high. She has also established herself as a critical favorite, winning awards from groups in Boston, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Indiana, Las Vegas, the Southeast, and the New York Film Critics Online. She has appeared on every shortlist for Best Actress, minor as a critics group or major as the BFCA, Golden Globes, and SAG Awards.
As I discussed last week, Portman has the performance but Bening has the respect. To win, she doesn’t need to be collecting all these awards, although it would help. She took home a very important Best Actress prize from the New York Film Critics Circle, a very influential group in the race. Until we see her go up against Portman, I see no reason to say she’s entitled to an Oscar victory for her career. She will need to win from the BFCA or the SAG Awards to assert her authority.
Jennifer Lawrence has also shown up on nearly every list made by critics, and she’s been winning her fair share of awards too, including from Detroit, San Diego, Toronto, and Washington D.C. She’s a critical darling in her own right, but I think she’s too young and too fresh a face to win.
There are several actresses vying for that last spot – Hilary Swank for “Conviction” who received a surprise SAG nomination, Halle Berry for “Frankie & Alice” who received a Golden Globe nomination, Julianne Moore for “The Kids Are All Right” who received a Golden Globe nomination, dark horse Swedish actress Noomi Rapace for “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” who received a BFCA nomiation, and Lesley Manville for “Another Year” who won the National Board of Review’s prize for Best Actress.
But I still think that last spot will be filled by Michelle Williams for “Blue Valentine” who was recognized by the Golden Globes and the BFCA as one of the best actresses of the year. She’s been an Oscar nominee before, and I think she has what it takes to sneak in.
Best Supporting Actor:
- Christian Bale, “The Fighter”
- Geoffrey Rush, “The King’s Speech”
- Jeremy Renner, “The Town”
(5)
- Andrew Garfield, “The Social Network”
- Mark Ruffalo, “The Kids Are All Right”
(NR)
Dropping off: Matt Damon
Christian Bale has become the closest thing to a lock we can get this season, winning nearly everything in sight. In addition to picking up Best Supporting Actor nominations from the BFCA, Golden Globes, and the SAG Awards, he won the award from Boston, Dallas-Fort Worth, Detroit, Houston, Indiana, Las Vegas, New York Film Critics Online, and Washington D.C. If nothing else, Oscar socialism could be at work here to give “The Fighter” a trophy.
Geoffrey Rush received the trifecta of nominations this week as well, although his only win on the critics circuit has come from the Southeastern Film Critics Association. He was the runner-up, though, for the Los Angeles critics, a very influential group. If Bale’s temper flares up soon, expect Rush to capitalize and take the trophy.
Rising this week is Jeremy Renner, last year’s Best Actor nominee for “The Hurt Locker,” who also received the three crucial nominations that Bale and Rush did. He’s a quick way to recognize the movie if they don’t want to give it a Best Picture nomination.
Andrew Garfield, while being recognized by the BFCA and Golden Globes, was snubbed by the SAG Awards. While I think the success of “The Social Network” will keep him afloat, I don’t think his nomination is any certainty. Worth noting – some much deserved love went the way of Armie Hammer, Garfield’s co-star who breathed life into the Winklevi, from the Toronto Film Critics for Best Supporting Actor. Two nominees from the same movie hasn’t happened in this category for almost 20 years, but perhaps if “The Social Network” hits big, it could happen.
Mark Ruffalo finally makes it into my shortlist after receiving the Best Supporting Actor prize from the influential New York Film Critics Association as well as nominations from the BFCA and SAG Awards. It’s still a little strange that he missed out on a Golden Globe nomination (at the inclusion of Michael Douglas in “Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps,” no less), but the surge of love for the movie looks to power him into the race over John Hawkes in “Winter’s Bone,” who received a SAG Award nomination in addition to his prizes from San Francisco and San Diego.
Best Supporting Actress:
- Melissa Leo, “The Fighter”
(3)
- Mila Kunis, “Black Swan”
(NR)
- Helena Bonham Carter, “The King’s Speech”
(2)
- Amy Adams, “The Fighter”
- Jacki Weaver, “Animal Kingdom”
(NR)
Dropping off: Hailee Steinfeld, Dianne Weist
I still have no idea what to make of this category. Melissa Leo seems to be an across-the-board favorite, so I’m inclined to favor her. She received nominations from all three major groups announcing this week and won the award from Dallas-Fort Worth, Washington D.C., the New York Film Critics Online, and most importantly the New York Film Critics Circle. In a year where there appears to be no clear favorite, she may be the consensus choice that everyone can agree on.
Amy Adams was also on board with Leo for the big three this week, also winning Detroit and Las Vegas’ prize. She could ultimately be Leo’s foil as vote-splitting becomes an issue. Of the six movies that received dual Best Supporting Actress nominations over the past decade, only one managed to win (Catherine Zeta-Jones over Queen Latifah in “Chicago”).
Mila Kunis stormed onto the scene this week, capturing nominations from the BFCA, Golden Globes, and SAG Awards. For a girl who this time last year was best known in cinema for her roles in “Forgetting Sarah Marshall” and “Max Payne,” this is a startling turnaround. The love shows that they love her performance, and I think the Oscars will reciprocate the love in a few weeks.
Helena Bonham Carter continues to ride on the coattails of the success of “The King’s Speech,” also popping up in all three major groups announcing their nominations this week. I see her much like Taraji P. Henson for “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” or Catherine Keener for “Capote” – great actresses turning in fairly good performances in beloved movies. Fairly good can’t win, but it’s sure going to get nominated.
The campaign for Jacki Weaver worked, so pat yourself on the back, Sony Pictures Classics. The “Animal Kingdom” actress was cited by the BFCA and Golden Globes as one of the five best supporting performances of the year, and she won the title outright from the Los Angeles critics, an extremely good sign that she’s headed for a nomination. The SAG snub hurt, and she still has to deal with lack of notoriety. But if it’s about the performance, she stands a good chance.
Dark horse Juliette Lewis won Boston’s prize for her work in “Conviction,” but I think it’s too small of a part to get nominated. Hailee Steinfeld took home top honors from Houston and Indiana for her work in “True Grit” and managed to net nominations rom the BFCA and SAG Awards. However, category confusion and lack of familiarity could keep her out. And for some strange reason, Dianne Weist has gone totally unnoticed this season save a meaningless Golden Satellite Award nomination. Bye, bye…
Best Original Screenplay:
- Inception
(3)
- The Kids Are All Right
- The King’s Speech
(1)
- Black Swan
(5)
- Another Year
(4)
Another pick that’s pretty far out there, but I’m getting a feeling that “Inception” will win Best Original Screenplay. The critics are all over its originality, and everyone seems on board the train. If “The Social Network” takes Best Picture, how else to reward this movie other than a few technical awards? Best Original Screenplay, of course, as the movie redefined originality and creativity for millions of moviegoers. The BFCA and Golden Globe nominations don’t hurt either.
Hot on its heels is “The Kids Are All Right,” which was recognized for its screenplay by the same two organizations. It also won the prize from the New York Film Critics Association (over “The Social Network,” I might add). There was a two-year comedy streak from 2006-2007, and we just hit a two-year drama streak. Perhaps it’s time for the pendulum to swing back…
While “The King’s Speech” also received the same two nominations, I just don’t feel like anyone is jumping up and down with love for the script. It’s an actor’s movie, not a writer’s movie, and the mentions feel more like courtesy than necessity. However, it did win the prize from the Southeastern critics and San Francisco and was a runner-up for Toronto, and Los Angeles’ prize, so maybe I’m wrong.
“Black Swan” is in because everyone likes the movie, and it got the nod from the BFCA. “Another Year” stays in because the Academy loves Mike Leigh.
Best Adapted Screenplay:
- The Social Network
- Toy Story 3
- 127 Hours
(NR)
- Winter’s Bone
(5)
- True Grit
(3)
Dropping off: Rabbit Hole
“The Social Network” is still in peak condition, winning nearly every Best Screenplay award there is. But I hesitate to call it a lock as “Precious” surprised the heavily favored “Up in the Air” last year. The heart is a factor in this category, and the heart belongs to “Toy Story 3.”
“127 Hours” soars to #3 thanks to its recognition by the BFCA and the Golden Globes in spite of my prior qualms that it wasn’t a movie that succeeded because of its writing. But if Danny Boyle can’t get a Best Director nomination, it sure looks like he will get one for Best Adapted Screenplay.
“Winter’s Bone” has been collecting plenty of screenplay nominations along the critics circuit, and it seems like a solid choice for a nomination.
“True Grit” slips to #5 and only stays in because the Academy loves the Coen Brothers’ writing. If “The Town” shows some might, it could easily replace the Western.
So, what do YOU think? Who do you think is cruising towards an Oscar nomination?
Leave a Reply