NOTE: This “Oscar Moment” is a tad different from any of the prior ones. Rather than focusing on a specific movie, this post focuses on a particular category – in this case, screenplays.
A recent feature that most studios have graciously included on these sites is access to the screenplay of that movie in its entirety. Personally, I find these a great way to learn about the different styles of moviemaking in the race. Some movies draw heavily from their screenplay, others use it as merely a guideline.
Therefore, I feel it to be my duty to impart the knowledge of this treasure trove of movie gold to any interest moviegoer reading this blog. Click on the links below and they will take you to the screenplay for that movie (I will update this page periodically with new screenplays when they become available). Enjoy, because the race is just beginning!
Today’s “Oscar Moment” is brought to you by the movie “A Single Man,” adapted from a decades-old novel by Christopher Isherwood (if that sounds like the closing of “Sesame Street,” excuse my tardiness of honoring the show’s 40th anniversary). The movie could follow a similar awards season road to “Slumdog Millionaire.” Both were discovered at film festivals, got a distributor, and began attracting much Oscar talk. “A Single Man” burst onto the scene at the Venice Film Festival, where Colin Firth took home the prize for Best Actor. He has since become a frontrunner in the Best Actor race at the Oscars. But Firth is not the only part of the movie getting attention. Julianne Moore has gained some traction in a tight Best Supporting Actress race, and Tom Ford, former fashion designer (something I know only from a quick Google search), has won raves for his first film.
From watching the trailer, after the shock of watching a montage filled with Ford’s distinct, visually arresting style, you probably are asking, “This looks good, but what is this movie about?” The movie centers around middle-aged homosexual British professor George Falconer (Firth) and him reeling from the death of his partner, Jim (Matthew Goode, “Watchmen”). It follows him over the course of a day, consoled by close friend Charley (Moore), as he tries to discover if life is worth living without Jim.
It is a tight Best Actor field this year, with heavyweights such as Morgan Freeman, Daniel Day-Lewis, and Jeff Bridges in contention. Yet most people seem to think that Firth is safe for at least a nomination. He is a likable actor, never demanding much attention, and making missteps in only the quietest of fashions. Although many people seem to have postulated that the Academy is very homophobic from its snub of “Brokeback Mountain,” the Best Actor prize went to Sean Penn for playing homosexual San Francisco mayor Harvey Milk last year.
Moore perhaps faces even stiffer competition in Best Supporting Actress. Mo’Nique is a lock (which I can now testify to from seeing the movie). Barring a complete flop of “Nine,” at least one actress will get in, if not two. “Up in the Air” has two strong candidates in the category, Anna Kendrick and Vera Farmiga. “The Lovely Bones” could also has two potential nominees with past winners Rachel Weisz and Susan Sarandon. I don’t think Moore is a certainty by any means, but I must keep in mind that I have not seen her performance in the movie. But she is a four-time nominee, and maybe it is her time. We all know how desperate the Academy was to award Kate Winslet last year after five times coming up empty on Oscar night, even willing to commit category fraud to give it to her.
As for the Best Picture/Director duo, it seems to be less likely than the two actors. The film’s subject matter could likely hurt it – I say this not because of my own personal beliefs but because there exists a large faction of old white men in the Academy opposed to homosexuality. I think the triumph of “Milk” last year shows significant progress, but nonetheless, this homophobia still exists, even if in vestiges. Without the expansion of the field of Best Picture nominees, I don’t think this would have a chance. But I think “A Single Man” lurks at the bottom of the ten or just outside of it. If one of the heavyweights like “Invictus” or “The Lovely Bones” underwhelms, I think “A Single Man” could sneak in and steal a spot. As for director Tom Ford, I am quite skeptical about his chances. While the trailer shows an appealing stylistic approach, this cannot cover the fact that this is Ford’s first film. It is fairly rare for a director to earn a nomination for their first project, and in such a strong year for directors, I think Ford will get lost in a crowd of big names like Clint Eastwood, Peter Jackson, and James Cameron.
I feel like I close every “Oscar Moment” on the same note: “I don’t care if it gets nominated, this looks good enough to get me to a theater!” The same goes for “A Single Man,” which opens in limited release on December 11 and will gradually expand across the country as awards season progresses.
BEST BETS FOR NOMINATIONS: Best Actor (Colin Firth), Best Supporting Actress (Moore), Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Cinematography, Best Art Direction
OTHER POTENTIAL NOMINATIONS: Best Picture, Best Director (Tom Ford)
Every year, one movie looks so impressive on paper that it is a foregone conclusion at the beginning of the year that it is not only a slam dunk to be a nominee, but also the assume winner of Best Picture. I think I speak for most pundits when I say that “Invictus” is that movie from 2009. When you mix one of the Academy’s favorite directors, Clint Eastwood, with two highly respected actors, Morgan Freeman and Matt Damon, not to mention a true inspirational story involving a beloved humanist, Nelson Mandela, it seems like simple math that these add up to Oscar gold.
But let’s look at the movies in a comparable position to “Invictus” from the past few years:
“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” was nominated for 13 Oscars, including Best Picture, Director, Actor, and Screenplay. However, its three victories came only from its technical merit.
“Atonement” was nominated for 7 Oscars, including Best Picture and Screenplay, and those were a surprise due to a fair level of disappointment that met the film upon its release. It ended up walking away with a statue for Best Score.
“Dreamgirls” was nominated for 8 Oscars in 6 categories (3 nominations came from Best Song), but the film surprisingly was omitted from many major categories including Best Picture, Director, and Screenplay. It ended up with two awards, Best Supporting Actress for Jennifer Hudson and Best Sound Mixing.
“Munich” was able to ride its assumed esteem into nominations for Best Picture, Director, and Screenplay, but it did not cash in on any of its nominations.
The only real conclusion that can be drawn from those results is that having sky-high expectations can often yield unfavorable results. If people expect something amazing, it is all the easier to underwhelm. So the only question that remains is which awards season path “Invictus” will tread – the extremely disappointing “Dreamgirls,” the mildly rewarding “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,” or perhaps it will even capitalize on its status and turn it into Oscar triumph.
It is hard to judge the film on its own merit, though, because no one has seen it. However, if the trailer is any indication, we are really in for a treat. “Invictus” seems to be one of those inspirational movies designed to make your heart melt, the type of movie that the Academy hadn’t rewarded in a while until last year when “Slumdog Millionaire” cleaned house. If “Slumdog” has really ushered in a new era of feel-good, triumphant films taking home the big prizes, “Invictus” seems to be a logical successor. But then again, I feel like bloggers like myself often create these “movements” much like some suspect English teachers of coming up with “themes.” Maybe we over think it, and the choice of a body of voters is just based on what movie took their breath away that year.
To bring up the obligatory other face of the coin, Clint Eastwood perhaps isn’t quite as venerated by the Academy as many think. Neither of his two works gained much attention; “Gran Torino” wound up with a goose egg in the nomination column, not even willing to acknowledge what could be the last time he steps in front of the camera. The Academy rarely awards more than two Oscars to actors and directors, and maybe the voters think that Eastwood has gotten enough recognition from them. On a different note, if people are looking for a fairly buoyant movie, they might find “Up in the Air” a more appealing choice. Critics claim that it truly expresses the zeitgeist of these tough economic times, addressing our problems but infusing the gravity with a bit of levity.
While I could spend all day discussing the awards potential of “Invictus,” I will let the movie speak for itself on December 11. Then I will be in a much better position to discourse.
This edition of “Oscar Moment” concerns one of the favorites since last year’s Oscars finished. People have huge expectations for “Nine,” and if it fails to live up to them, the repercussions could be disastrous. It has every reason to succeed, though, based on a pedigree so impressive that it could be never be matched again. It has been a favorite in the Oscar race ever since it was announced; however, at the time of this posting, it remains a wild card in the race because no one has seen the full film yet.
Christmas Day always brings some of the year’s most spectacular movies. Possibly the best of this year’s offerings is the musical “Nine.” If it is anything less than spectacular, it will be a disappointment. It is directed by Rob Marshall, the Oscar-nominated director of Best Picture winner “Chicago.” The star of the movie is two-time Academy Award-winner Daniel Day-Lewis as Guido, a film director tormented by the women in his life. And these are not just ordinary women. They are played by Oscar winners Marion Cotillard, Nicole Kidman, Penelope Cruz, Judi Dench, Sophia Loren, nominee Kate Hudson, and the illustrious Fergie. The musical which provides the basis of the film won 5 Tony Awards including Best Musical. The musical is based on the life of beloved and renowned director Frederico Fellini. Are you impressed yet? “Nine” had me at Rob Marshall. (NOTE: Recognize this? It was in my November preview post, but Harvey Weinstein decided to push the movie’s release back to December. It’s not plagiarism if you quote yourself, right?)
Let’s talk the ladies of “Nine.” Because barring an absolute flop of the movie, Daniel Day-Lewis is assured a nomination just by virtue of being Daniel Day-Lewis. The Academy loves him, and because he makes so few movies, they make it a point to reward him when he does. Five of the women seem to have a legitimate shot at Oscar gold (Fergie and Kate Hudson have only minor parts), but as I discussed with “Up in the Air” earlier, this is great for moviegoers and bad for actresses. The three scenarios I outlined there (one gets nominated, both get nominated, neither gets nominated) work when dealing with two actresses; “Nine” could have up to five campaigning for supporting actress. Thus, we must deal with “Nine” in a completely different way.
Word on the street (and by street, I mean blogs) is that Marion Cotillard, who plays Guido’s wife, has enough screen time that she can be put in the leading actress category. The filmmakers showed enough confidence in Cotillard that they turned a new number written for three women into a solo for her. My guess is that this is where the ad money will push her. Harvey Weinstein knows how to work the system, and he wants the most nominations he can get. Voters might be hesitant to put three “Nine” ladies in one category, but he knows they would probably be willing to vote one for lead and two for supporting.
So if Cotillard goes lead, who will be the nominee(s) for Best Supporting Actress? Despite all the talent, history tells us that “Nine” will probably be limited to two nominees in the category. Only “Tom Jones” in 1963 managed to sneak in three women; that movie won 4 Oscars including Best Picture. More notable though is that it did not collect the statue for Best Supporting Actress. The loss is due to a familiar phenomenon: vote splitting. It is how “Dreamgirls” and “Enchanted” managed to lose Best Original Song. Voters want to reward the movie, but they can’t rally behind a single nominee and someone else wins. But luckily for “Nine,” Harvey Weinstein has played this game many times. My guess is that he will start campaigning all the actresses evenly, but as more reviews come in and people see the movie, he will push the clear favorite.
At this time, the favorite is unknown. But based on the Broadway productions of the musical, an educated guess can be formed. In the original Broadway production, the Tony Award winner for Best Featured Actress was Liliane Montevecchi for her portrayal of Lilliane, Guido’s producer. In the movie, Liliane will be played by Judi Dench, who won this category back in 1998 for playing Queen Elizabeth for all of six minutes in “Shakespeare in Love.” Dench also has 5 other nominations, only one of which came from the supporting category. However, the research I have done seems to suggest that Lilliane is not a very flashy role. She does not have a solo song, and even if she is an integral part of other numbers, that seems to suggests that she is more of a subtle presence than a central part of the plot. (This is my interpretation from three years of musical theater experience.)
On the other hand, Penelope Cruz has the fiery role of Carla, Guido’s mistress. This role won Jane Krakowski (“30 Rock”) a Tony Award for the revival of “Nine” in 2003. Contrastingly to Lilliane, Carla has an absolute show-stopping number: “A Call to the Vatican.” All the pictures of Cruz doing acrobatics in skimpy clothing are from this number. I have been listening to it for months, and I am really excited to see what she can do with it. Carla is more directly involved with the main storyline, really closer to a lead than a true supporting actress like Lilliane. I think Cruz is the most likely nominee from the bunch for this reason, although voters might be hesitant to give her the prize because she won it last year.
The remaining prospects left to touch on are Sophia Loren, who plays Guido’s mother, and Nicole Kidman, who plays Claudia, the star of Guido’s new movie. Guido’s mother barely appears in the plot summary anywhere, so I can only see a nomination plausible for Loren if the Academy falls head over heels for “Nine” and nominates Loren for nostalgic purposes. Although I will say, Guido’s mother sings the titular track “Nine,” and it is the sweet thing that melts voters. Claudia, on the other hand, has several beautiful numbers with Guido. Nicole Kidman has shown her capability with handling musicals – in fact, it’s how she got her first Academy Award nomination. But as for being an audience or critical favorite, Claudia has seem to have fallen short on Broadway. The role was only nominated for one major award, the slightly less prestigious Drama Desk, during its two runs on the Great White Way. I am most excited to see how this story plays out; that is, if audiences treasure Kidman especially or if she plays second fiddle to the other actresses like on stage.
As I now look back and see how much I have written, it just gets me more and more excited for Oscar season to really kick off! Can we get the countdown started until Christmas please?
BEST BETS FOR NOMINATIONS: Best Picture, Best Director (Rob Marshall), Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Supporting Actress (Penelope Cruz/Judi Dench), Best Cinematography, Best Production Design, Best Costume Design, Best Sound Mixing, Best Original Song
OTHER POTENTIAL NOMINATIONS: Best Supporting Actress (Nicole Kidman/Sophia Loren), Best Adapted Screenplay
P.S. – Check out this amazing new trailer, showing the transformation of “Nine” from rehearsal to production.
This edition of “Oscar Moment” concerns “An Education,” a coming of age story in 1960s Britain. The movie has been generating massive buzz since its premiere at the Sundance Film Festival, particularly around leading actress and breakout star Carey Mulligan. She plays 16-year-old Jenny, dead set on going to study at Oxford. However, things change when she meets the magnetic David (Peter Sarsgaard). He is much older than she and offers her a glimpse of a world that she has never imagined. After being introduced to a new lifestyle, her old ideals and values begin to fly out the window. But their relationship is unable to transcend societal norms, and they come crashing down on unsuspecting Jenny. Will she be completely broken? Will the old Jenny return, or will a new and independent woman be born from the ashes.
I knew that the story involved coming-of-age since I first heard of it back in January, but I had no idea that it involved someone my age. This is so thrilling to hear because no one makes good, independent, thought-provoking movies about people my age!
Some Oscar prognosticators I read have boiled the Best Actress race at the Oscars down to Carey Mulligan vs. Meryl Streep for “Julie & Julia.” Others have gone as far as to say that she already has the statue in the bag. Although I do like an exciting and unpredictable race, I love when a performance so magnificent comes along that allows people to call the race in January. My humble prediction is that if other female performances fizzle and it does boil down to Carey and Meryl, the Oscars will choose the former just because Meryl already has two. Not to mention recent trends show a tendency to honor up and coming actresses, such as in 2007 with the stunning victory of Marion Cotillard.
But the buzz isn’t around Mulligan solely. Alfred Molina, who plays Jenny’s father, has been acknowledged as a strong candidate for Best Supporting Actor. Some say that if the film hits big with the Academy, goodwill could result in nominations for some other cast members, like Rosamund Pike in Best Supporting Actress and Peter Sarsgaard in Best Actor. The latter seems improbable just due to how stacked the Best Actor category appears this year. The film’s director, Lone Scherfig, could find herself nominated due to the nature of the year and its spotlight on female directors. Nick Hornby, author of the source material for “About a Boy” and “Fever Pitch,” penned the script based on Lynn Hornby’s memoirs; his chances seem somewhat more auspicious. And the film itself, provided it registers as a blip on the public’s radar, seems likely to land itself in the Best Picture category.
It pains me to know that I have to wait until October 30th for “An Education” to hit a theater in Houston. But until then, I will be enjoying selections from the soundtrack, which is stellar. If you wonder what the catchy tune from the trailer is called, it is “You’ve Got Me Wrapped Around Your Little Finger” by Beth Rowley.
BEST BETS FOR NOMINATIONS: Best Picture, Best Actress (Carey Mulligan), Best Supporting Actor (Alfred Molina), Best Adapted Screenplay
OTHER POTENTIAL NOMINATIONS: Best Director (Lone Scherfig), Best Actor (Peter Sarsgaard), Best Supporting Actress (Rosamund Pike/Emma Thompson/Cara Seymour)
You’ve already heard me say my fair share about “Up in the Air,” but a new trailer was released and I couldn’t help myself. This trailer gives us more information about the plot, yet it still leaves us with curiosity and excitement.
Most pundits are now calling “Up in the Air” the frontrunner for many Oscars including Best Picture. They say this with confidence after the movie opened to unanimous critical acclaim at the Toronto Film Festival last month. As I stated in a post a few weeks ago, I am really pumped for this to open. If only George Clooney didn’t have two other movies opening in November, I could be seeing the movie a month earlier than I am forced to now.
I have already made a point to highlight Clooney and Reitman, so I will take this “Oscar Moment” to focus on the supporting cast. Of these, the most prominently featured in the trailer is Anna Kendrick, who plays Natalie, the naive Cornell graduate assigned to shadow Ryan Bingham (Clooney). I have not seen any of Kendrick’s previous work; some girls might recognize her from a certain movie that I refuse to mention (if forced to reference it, I will simply call it “the T-word”). But Reitman wrote the part of Natalie specifically for Kendrick, so clearly she has chops.
Another supporting actress worth noting is Vera Farmiga, who plays Alex Goran, the frequent traveler of Bingham’s dreams. Unlike Kendrick, I have seen one of Farmiga’s performances as the spellbinding lone female presence in “The Departed.” Like Kendrick, Reitman wrote the role especially for her. From my limited vantage point, it would appear that Farmiga has the more daunting character to tackle because Alex seems to illuminate a sensitive side of Bingham through their encounters.
While having a great supporting cast makes for an outstanding movie, it can often prove troublesome around awards season. In supporting categories, it is not unheard of to have two nominated performances from the same film. But the supporting actress category is teeming with talent this year. Mo’Nique is a virtual lock, and, barring a complete meltdown, “Nine” will most assuredly have one actress in the category (my money is on Marion Cotillard). I see three possible scenarios for Farmiga and Kendrick, sorted below in order of probability:
One of the women will emerge an audience favorite and will be nominated.
The movie proves so unstoppable that both are nominated.
Voters are split between the two and neither receives a significant enough showing to receive a nomination.
Most experts seem to be leaning towards the first scenario, and they think it will be to Kendrick’s benefit. I have to say I agree because the Best Supporting Actress category has traditionally been one to reward young talent. The second scenario seems more likely to play out in favor of “Nine” just because the actresses are already so established and loved (Winners Nicole Kidman, Marion Cotillard, Judi Dench, Penelope Cruz; nominee Kate Hudson). I just love thinking about these types of situations because it means a lot of great performances and movies – who doesn’t want that?
BEST BET FOR NOMINATIONS: Best Picture, Best Director (Jason Reitman), Best Actor (George Clooney), Best Supporting Actress (Anna Kendrick and/or Vera Farmiga), Best Adapted Screenplay
Today, you get to witness the birth of something miraculous. A new column is born out of Marshall’s avoidance of writing more reviews (there are 3 that will come down the pipeline soon, I promise!), the “Oscar Moment.” Every time there is a big piece of news involving the Academy Awards or big Oscar candidate emerges, you can count on finding it here.
The inaugural “Oscar Moment” is centered around “Precious.” The film has positioned itself as a virtual lock for a Best Picture nomination and a frontrunner for the win. It has won the People Choice Awards at two of the most prestigious film festivals, Sundance and Toronto. This is the first movie to have taken both awards. I have been hearing nothing but raves about it for months, including from a friend of mine who saw it at Sundance earlier this year. He describes it as one of the most emotionally wrenching movies he has ever watched and a marvel of filmmaking. He also sang the praises of Mo’Nique, considered to be the one to beat in the Best Supporting Actress category this year, saying that he “has never felt such mixed emotions about a character.”
The movie is adapted from a novel by the author Sapphire, originally titled “Push.” Unfortunately, due to a certain superhero movie that opened earlier this year, the movie chose to change its title to “Precious” after the main character. Precious is an illiterate and obese teenager living in poverty in New York. Bad enough for you yet? She has an abusive mother. Still not tough enough? She is carrying her second child by her father. Yet through all of this, Precious manages to maintain hope, dreaming of marrying a light-skinned boy and getting an education.
“Precious” tackles tough topics, and if it is anything like the trailer, we are in for a bumpy ride. And I can’t tell if it is supposed to be uplifting at all. Frankly, I don’t want to know. But every piece about the movie that I have read has described it as an emotional roller coaster and a movie with such power that you have to get into the proper mental state to prepare yourself for viewing. I certainly admire movies that are so affecting that I can only watch them once, such as “Schindler’s List,” “The Pianist,” and “Revolutionary Road.” With the exception of the latter, they have found great success at the Oscars. However, I think the content that “Precious” deals with may be too polarizing for a win. But I can guarantee I will show up on opening weekend at my art house cinema with a pack of tissues, prepared to have my heart ripped out.
BEST BETS FOR NOMINATIONS: Best Picture, Best Director (Lee Daniels), Best Actress (Gabourey Sidibe), Best Supporting Actress (Mo’Nique), Best Adapted Screenplay
Recent Comments