With all the hype around Jacki Weaver’s performance in “Animal Kingdom,” I just had to see what all the fuss was about this week. And to be honest, I wasn’t all that impressed. In my review, I wrote:
“As for Jacki Weaver, the reason I plopped this movie in my DVD player, I saw why she needed an Oscar campaign but not why she deserved a campaign. She plays a one-note character that doesn’t play much of a part in the storyline until the conclusion. Her big emotional scene falls pretty flat, unless, of course, you consider changing her facial expression ever so slightly compelling enough for an award. Had I not heard all the buzz around Weaver, I would have forgotten about her as quickly as I’ll forget ‘Animal Kingdom.’ Neither have any teeth, something necessary to make a crime thriller bite.”
But with the campaign in high gear, she seems to be making a mark. So back in December, I polled readers on an Oscar Moment, asking them if they thought Weaver would receive an Oscar nomination.
The jury was in favor of Weaver as both voters said she would be nominated. If I were an Academy member, I wouldn’t vote for her. But I’m not an Academy member, and I think she will probably make it. But I’m not confident or positive in that assertion.
Leave a Reply