Random Factoid #489

29 11 2010

Every movie blog I read has been offering thoughts, thoughts, and more thoughts on the AMPAS’ announcement of the hosts for the 83rd Academy Awards.  But in case my blog is the closest you get to movie news, let me fill you in on a little secret: James Franco and Anne Hathaway were tapped to host.

In my opinion, this is something to celebrate.  Both are dramatic actors with incredibly potent comedic talent (as evidenced by their “Saturday Night Live” appearances), and they have an exuberant youthful charm that makes them incredible winning figures.  I think they will light up the Oscar stage, and if anyone has any doubts, see Anne Hathaway’s song-and-dance number with Hugh Jackman from two years ago.

It’s a curious choice indeed with the hosts having performances in play for big awards, but I think if we leave the politics out of it (which many Oscar analysts won’t), it will be an inspired show.  The pairing of Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin worked last year, and the 2010 variation on the buddy host scheme is meant to appeal to a younger crowd.  This generation (hem, my generation) has not traditionally shown an interest in the show, and Franco and Hathaway will certainly be a draw.

All I can say is: I’m still waiting for someone to top Whoopi Goldberg’s “African Queen” moment from 1999, which is one of the main reason why I’m obsessed with the Oscars.  (Read more about it in Random Factoid #221.)





Random Factoid #488

28 11 2010

I realize that I am totally powerless to do anything about this issue, but that won’t stop me from voicing my opinion.

It’s such a nuisance when I’m at a movie and can hear what’s playing in the theater next to me.  This is mainly a problem when I’m seeing quieter movies like comedies or dramas and next door there’s an action movie playing, which always promises plenty of loud bangs and explosions.  If I pay for a movie, I want to see AND hear just what I paid for, not what someone else paid for.

So I guess this really only goes out to builders of new movie theaters: make your walls THICKER and more soundproof!  Not that anyone’s making them in this economy…

P.S. – Make the new theaters look like this!

P.P.S. – RIP Leslie Nielsen.





Random Factoid #487

27 11 2010

Yesterday, I finished David Sedaris’ “When You Are Engulfed in Flames,” well over a year after I first picked it up.  For some strange reason, last week I just had this insatiable mental impetus to devour a book.  I found Sedaris’ collection of hilarious essays nestled in my bookcase and decided to start over and bask in his humor once again.

The whole movie blogging gig really does keep me away from books.  As I wrote back in Random Factoid #352

I really do love to read, and I used to use my free time to do a whole lot more of it.  It’s such a therapeutic thing for me to do, and it’s great for building vocabulary as well.  I have a huge bookshelf in my room filled with shelves of books I haven’t read.  I really do intend to get to them some day, but it’s hard to find the time.

And reading is another thing that gets pushed to the side doing movie blogging (like TV, which I described in Random Factoid #259).  It’s so hard to resist the temptation to get the full satisfaction of watching a plot arc develop in around two hours in a movie, while it takes days and days to read through a book.  Reading a book has less immediate gratification, something I’m constantly told my generation has a problem with.

I feel compelled after reading a whole book of Sedaris that without him, the Random Factoid feature and the abundant humor (at least I hope) within might not be present at all.  I’ve certainly learned a lot about how to have a present and booming voice through his writing, and I certainly try to emulate through the Random Factoids the laughs I get from reading him.  These posts usually receive the most comments and feedback of anything I do on this site; I think it’s because I try to make this blog a very personal thing, and the Random Factoids are the least formal, most Marshall things I write.

So, what should you get from this post? 1) Thank David Sedaris, 2) Read David Sedaris, and 3) Keep reading me!

(For those curious, my reading craze is still going on.  I’m currently devouring George Orwell’s “Animal Farm” and will then move on to either Jeffrey Eugenides’ “The Virgin Suicides” or Steig Larsson’s “The Girl Who Played With Fire.”)





Random Factoid #486

26 11 2010

Today, November 26, 2010, I achieved an important milestone.

As I reported back on December 26, 2010 in Random Factoid #151, I got a whole lot of movie money.  $150, to be precise.  And today, I finally spent the last dollar of that money.

That’s not to say $150 covered all of my moviegoing expenses in 2010.  I used plenty of my own money to buy tickets, and there were several times when I simply forgot I had gift cards to use.  But I also got tickets to a whole lot of free screenings which also helped my frugality.

So, a month away from Christmas 2010, I have to wonder how far this year’s money will go.





Random Factoid #485

25 11 2010

Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!

Hope you all are having some nice, relaxing time with friends and family – and, of course, EATING!  PopEater posed the question three weeks ago of what celebrity you would want to spend Thanksgiving with, and I gave this a lot of thought.  I translated it into cinematic form, and the question I wound up asking myself was, “What movie family would I want to spend Thanksgiving with?”

Since Thanksgiving is a holiday all about family togetherness and eating, I figure I would have to pick a family that ate heartily and without shame.  So, if I was going to spend Thanksgiving dinner with one family, it would clearly be …

The Klumps! They sure can argue, but I feel like they would put it aside on Thanksgiving Day and just feast.

Who would you want to spend Thanksgiving with?





Random Factoid #484

24 11 2010

I’ll go there again – another moviegoing pet peeve that I think I may have just realized bothers me.

PDA.  No, not the ancient name for Palm Pilots and BlackBerrys, I’m talking about Public Display of Affection.  Or, as I’ve heard it alternatively dubbed, public demanding of attention.

That second definition is exactly what it means to me when done in a movie theater.  When seeing “Harry Potter” for the second time, I had to squeeze in next to a couple very much in love in order to get four seats together for my entire family.  At the beginning of the trailers, his hand was on her kneecap.  Throughout the movie, I would hear a little giggle, and the hand would move up just a little bit.  By about halfway through the movie, that same hand was about halfway up her knee.

At that point, I was feeling fairly awkward that they were having a nice little moment and here I was trying to watch a movie.  I’d tell them to get a room, but why do that when we both paid $10.25 to sit in the same room?  I don’t think a movie, particularly “Harry Potter” in its first week, should send a message that it’s an appropriate place for some intimacy.  It should send the message saying, “I love you but I want to see what happens to Harry Potter for a few hours, so I’m going to disengage for 2 1/2 hours aside from a few trite comments every once in a while.”

All things considered, compared to crying babies and inappropriate laughter, PDA in a movie theater isn’t that bad.  But it’s still a nuisance.  Can’t everyone just be on their best behavior for two hours so I can enjoy a movie?

P.S. – I’ve had the idea after reading an excessive amount of David Sedaris that maybe I should turn all these nasty moviegoing experiences into some great book of humorous anecdotal essays.  Thoughts?





Random Factoid #483

23 11 2010

The directors of the new and already forgotten movie “Skyline,” the Strause Brothers, were quite outspoken about the movie’s visual effects.  They worked on movies like “Titanic,” “300,” and “Avatar” but decided to make their own movie on a sort of DIY scale.  The movie’s release certainly made them feel entitled to call out in Vulture the special effects that movies still mess up: fur, dust, water, and breath.

I’ll admit that they are right, to a certain extent.  Those are things that are often botched, and much of the technology that has come out recently have been to correct the obvious errors in these elements.  But I’m not writing this post to speculate on visual effects’ flaws today; I’m writing to talk about visual effects of the past.

It’s so funny to watch “Spider-Man,” the 2002 release that sparked the superhero craze all over again, and see the visual effects.  Not that they are terrible because I remember being so wowed by them in third grade.  It was the talk of recess for quite some time.  But I want to say just how incredible it is that we can look at a movie only eight years old and see what incredible leaps and bounds technology has taken in that time.  You don’t watch it and say, “Oh, that looks terrible.”  You watch it and say, “Oh, we can do that so much better now!”

It’s an interesting phenomenon that I invite anyone who loves nostalgia to take part in.





Random Factoid #482

22 11 2010

Welcome back to the random factoid column, which I should really just rename “Dumb Stuff Jessica Alba Says.”  As you may remember, she made the news last week for Elle interview in which she claimed that good actors never use the script.  Well, the rest of the interview was published, and now the whole world is left to wonder why she can’t just shut her trap.

In the interview, she also went after directors, particularly “Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer” director Tim Story.  Here’s an excerpt of the garbage spewing out of her mouth on this topic:

“[Story said] ‘It looks too real. It looks too painful. Can you be prettier when you cry? Cry pretty, Jessica.’ He was like, ‘Don’t do that thing with your face. Just make it flat. We can CGI the tears in.’ And I’m like, But there’s no connection to a human being. And then it all got me thinking: Am I not good enough? Are my instincts and my emotions not good enough? Do people hate them so much that they don’t want me to be a person? Am I not allowed to be a person in my work? And so I just said, ‘F**k it. I don’t care about this business anymore.'”

Right, I forgot that Jessica Alba was a three-time Academy Award winning actress who needed virtually no direction!  Oh, wait, that’s Katharine Hepburn, sorry for the mental snafu.

Alba claims that this role made her want to quit acting altogether.  Guys, let’s be honest, we don’t watch a Jessica Alba movie to see powerful acting; we watch it to see Jessica Alba looking pretty.  So if she just resigned herself to modeling, she wouldn’t be breaking any of our hearts.





Random Factoid #481

21 11 2010

This is totally random, out there, and will probably be discarded as one of those “too personal” posts that probably have no use to the average reader.  But if you made it past that first long sentence, then clearly you give some sort of a care about what I’m writing, so I’ll write it anyways.

For all those in need of a productivity boost, I have a tip that has been working for me a lot recently.  Simply play the track “In Motion” from Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross’ prodigious score for “The Social Network” and feel your fingers get in rhythm with the pulsating beat.  Then curl them up into a fist one a finger at a time, beginning with the pinky, a la Jesse Eisenberg as Mark Zuckerberg hacking into the Harvard network to create Facebook.  And then attack whatever task you need to do.

You may not feel like you are sewing the seeds for a multi-billion dollar company, but it sure feels a lot better than just diving into the task with a frown.

Just my advice.





Random Factoid #480

20 11 2010

I have seen “127 Hours” – finally!  So now I can finally share my thoughts on the amputation scene that has caused more than a handful of people to faint!

To answer your first question, thank you, I didn’t pass out!  I was able to take it, flinching a little bit but never shutting my eyes.  There were quite a few people who screamed, though, and I heard a couple of ladies yelling “oh, Lord!” behind me.  But that’s not the behavior I want to talk about.

What I want to talk about is at the end of the scene – that is, when it is finished – the person next to me laughed.  For about 30 seconds.  While the rest of the theater was in total shock, all of us with our jaws about to hit the floor, he felt the need to laugh.  His behavior was totally inappropriate, and it ruined (or at least dampened) the emotional impact of the scene.  I know I say “I can’t stand” a lot of things about going to a movie like crying babies or odorous people, but this may require a second viewing to get the moment right.

Has anyone else had a movie ruined by an ill-timed outburst?





Random Factoid #479

19 11 2010

In case you haven’t heard, there’s a new pairing of legendary director and actor to make every pundit go “Oscar winner in 2 years.”  Morgan Freeman and Clint Eastwood for “Invictus” was an example of just such a pairing.

Now it’s Daniel Day-Lewis as Abraham Lincoln, one of the most well-respected figures in American history, in Steven Spielberg’s long-delayed biopic “Lincoln.”  Liam Neeson was the original pick for the role, but due to scheduling and his eventual aging, he dropped out of the project.  Both are incredibly capable actors who would do a great job in the role, but there’s one issue I have – neither are American!

I hardly think ethnic casting is an issue for something as simple as American/British actors, as they cross over accents and nationalities with ease.  But when it comes to playing, in my mind, the greatest American in our history, I would think an American would be cast.  Not to say that Day-Lewis can’t, with the proper amount of research, know what a crucial role Lincoln plays in our history, but he won’t have the same passion as an American.

What do you think?  Should Abraham Lincoln be played by a non-American?





Random Factoid #477

17 11 2010

I have to admit, I’ve always wondered if I would ever walk into a theater thinking I was seeing one movie and then see another.  I get particularly suspicious when the trailers before the movie don’t seem to match in tone with the movie I’m about to see.  What I could only imagine became a reality for some audiences this week.  According to Cinematical, here’s what went down:

“Families at Showcase Cinemas in Revere, Massachusetts were expecting to see ‘Megamind,’ a colorful, animated superhero adventure presented in eye-popping 3D. Instead, they got the first few minutes of ‘Saw 3D,’ a bloody, gruesome horror movie presented in 3D so that you can literally see eyes popping. It remains uncertain whether or not the traumatized children and their shocked parents began to flee after the footless man cauterized his leg stump with a burning steam pipe or after the woman got lowered into the buzz saw.”

Now these kids are scarred for life, all thanks to the negligence of a projectionist.  I didn’t think this actually happened, but now one person’s mistake could lead to a whole lot of therapy.

Did anybody else think this didn’t actually happen?





Random Factoid #476

16 11 2010

Well, there goes Redbox as being a great deal for consumers.

Studios have been running one step behind in terms of catching up with consumer’s taste in moviewatching.  By the time they get there to jack up the prices, the boat has sailed away to the next big thing.  Looks like Redbox is just another has-been now.

According to Company Town, Fox will begin charging a premium on DVD releases through Redbox beginning with the release of “Knight & Day” in December (darn you, Tom Cruise).  This is supposedly the alternative to delaying their release by 4 weeks, the past strategy to maximize profits on DVD sales.

Here’s my theory on what will happen: people might not notice at first, since it’s just a few movies.  Then, every studio will start doing it for their new movies, and people will turn away.  Eventually, they will charge a premium on every movie with an actor you’ve heard of, leaving the $1 rentals for cheap knock-offs alone.  Some will argue that iTunes has remained successful in spite of their price increase, but let me remind you that Apple has a virtual monopoly over the e-music industry.  There are alternatives to Redbox.

The big question is: what will rise in the post-Redbox era?  Will this just ensure Netflix’s continued success?





Random Factoid #475

15 11 2010

Dear Jean-Luc Godard,

I understand that some people don’t like awards for one reason or another, and that’s totally OK with me.  You are entitled to your own opinions, and I respect that.

But since you called your honorary Oscar “worthless,” may I submit myself as a candidate to receive the trophy?  I’ve never seen any of your movies, but I have read your Wikipedia page.  Your movies seem perhaps a little too artsy for my tastes, but nonetheless, if the Oscars recognize you, that means you must be good.  (I’m willing to have the oversight of Sandra Bullock last year.)

If you decide to comply with my opinions, just know that you will be giving your trophy to someone who wants an Oscar quite badly.  If you don’t want the Oscar, why keep it?  Feel free to contact my here on my blog.  If this is too high-tech for you, Mr. Godard, just have one of your assistants contact me and I will send an address to which you can conveniently mail the trophy.  I’m willing to pay the postage from France.

Sincerely,
Marshall





Random Factoid #474

14 11 2010

I talk a lot about the moviegoing experience, particularly all the things that can go wrong with it.  In fact, I think this is the second time that I said I’ve stopped linking to other factoids simply because I’ve said so much.  Nonetheless, I have a new entry to the “things that bother me when I go see a movie.”

I saw “Black Swan” today to a packed Houston Cinematic Arts Festival crowd, which was nice to see the fledgling fest get some turnout.  However, big crowds mean getting crowded.  I’m no claustrophobe, mind you, but I like to adhere to the “one seat” principle of moviegoing.  If you aren’t familiar with it by the technical name I’ve decided to give it, I’m sure you follow it.  When you go to a movie, you always leave one seat of space between you and a stranger.  But since this was a sell-out event, I had to squeeze in with a total stranger.

I don’t know if the chillier temperatures in Houston have just made my nose that much more acute, but the guy sitting next to me had some terrible B.O.  I’m talking high school locker room B.O.  The kind that will stop you dead in your tracks.  But since it’s crowded, I don’t have anywhere to move, and I catch a whiff of his lovely fumes every time he makes a move.  Which, during “Black Swan,” is a lot.

So add B.O. to the annals of moviegoing annoyances.  And for that matter, add perfume, because even though it can smell like flowers sometimes, no one wants to be smelling someone for two hours or more.