REVIEW: Paper Heart

15 04 2010

What drew me into “Paper Heart” was how adorable Charlyne Yi was.  Here is a normal girl, maybe a bit too frumpy for Hollywood standards, trying to make it big.  Oh, I so wanted her to succeed and take the business by storm!

And this seemed to be such a great pilot for her career (although her bit role in “Knocked Up” was pretty darn funny).  It’s a twist on the romantic comedy genre, almost lampooning it and criticizing it for the ideas that it puts into our heads about how a relationship should be.  Inside the movie, Charlyne makes a documentary about how she doesn’t believe in love when all of a sudden, Michael Cera shows up and sweeps her off of her feet.  From afar, it seemed to be so original and introspective.

As much as I wanted it to succeed, what could have been original turned out to be quite predictable.  Thankfully, it wasn’t predictable in conventional or clichéd ways.  Let’s think about this, what’s going to happen if you are trying to start a romantic relationship when you have camera crews following you around everywhere.  Obviously, a major strain is going to develop and communication is going to be severely hampered.  Any person who can think logically will have figured this movie out within a matter of minutes, and the other 90 will only serve to confirm what you already know.

Yet there’s something about “Paper Heart” that makes it impossible to really hate.  It definitely feels very genuine, and Charlyne Yi is able to connect really well to the movie because she wrote it.  Throughout the “documentary” portion, she interviews people and asks them what they think love is and why they believe in it.  She gathers up some interesting suspects, from science professors to schoolyard kids to married couples.  These views are presented, and you can agree with whomever you want.  It’s just like Burger King; you can have it your way.  There’s something rather satisfying about that.  B /





Random Factoid #260

14 04 2010

So many friends and fellow bloggers always talk about Netflix.  “I’ll add this to my Netflix queue,” someone will say.  “Forget theaters, I’m waiting for it to come out on Netflix,” others have said.

For some, Netflix has become synonymous with home video and renting.

I don’t have Netflix, and I really don’t know why.  I get e-mails all the time offering me free monthly subscriptions, but I have only taken one of them.  I didn’t end up using it during the free month.  I’m usually just so sporadic with renting movies that Netflix doesn’t provide wiggle-room for my spontaneity.





Explaining the Sidebar, Part 3

14 04 2010

In the final installment of the “Explaining the Sidebar” series, I will explain how to operate the heavy machinery that is the final four boxes of the sidebar.  Consider this your license to explore.  (Gosh, 5 Hour Energy makes me so cheesy!)

Blog Posts

This is another sidebar box that is of questionable importance, but I think it has served its purpose quite well.  I feature these five posts (more will be added later) because these are the columns that I have put the most time into.  They are usually very personal or meaningful in content, and I really want everyone to read them.  But if this is seen as just taking up space and not having much use, I’d consider taking it down.

Fellow Bloggers

If you are looking for other average joes and janes who love cinema and foist their love onto the world wide web, then click any one of these links and be transported to another fantastic blog.  For those who blog, the quickest way to get on this list is by commenting enough for me to really notice you – but I also creepily express my admiration here too.

The Pros

I’m not going to pretend like I have all the answers to every movie question.  Try asking me about any movie made before 1990.  I’ve seen maybe 50 of them.

But I know people who do know the answers, and I want you to find the answers.  So, I have included a box that will direct you to some professional movie sites that I visit very frequently.  Some are databases, some are real critics’ blogs, and others are speculations from those close to the industry.  Hopefully between all of these, you can find anything you could ever want (except maybe the meaning of life).

F.I.L.M. of the Week

The anchor of the sidebar highlights the movie I featured as my F.I.L.M. (First-Class, Independent Little-Known Movie) of the Week.  I like having it there because it’s an additional way to feature my selection, and it promotes a movie that is undoubtedly good in my mind.  Clicking on the poster will take you to my article explaining what makes it so great.

The box seemed a little awkward to me at first, so I posted a poll to gauge the reader’s opinion.  The vote was 6-2 in favor of keeping it, so I have.

And thus concludes the “Explaining the Sidebar” series.  I hope this has proved both educational, entertaining, and informing for you – but it won’t be the latter of three for me if you don’t comment and let me know how I can make the sidebar better for you.





Random Factoid #259

13 04 2010

Before I started movie blogging, I watched four TV shows religiously: “Lost,” “The Office,” “30 Rock,” and “SNL.”  But I now feel an obligation to spend whatever free time I have watching movies – after all, I don’t write a TV blog.

This year, I have watched two episode of the final season of “Lost” and only caught clips of “SNL” on Hulu.  Much to my chagrin, I haven’t watched a single episode of “30 Rock” or “The Office.”  The sacrifices I make for you all.

Although it is worth noting that I have started watching occasional episodes of “Modern Family” on Hulu in recent weeks.  Mainly because of this promo shown during the Oscars:

“Cloudy with a Chance of the Meatballs!”
“This means one word!”
“MEATBALLS!”





Explaining the Sidebar, Part 2

13 04 2010

In the second part of the “Explaining the Sidebar” series, I will further explore the untapped beauty and simplicity of the sidebar.  All hyperboles aside, here we go.

What's Going On at "Marshall and the Movies"

The “What’s Going On” box is my personalized “most popular” section.  WordPress offers a “most popular” section, but I don’t really like the way they pick the posts.  In this box, I link to the pieces that I think are the most exciting and the ones that I am the most proud of writing.  It’s the best that “Marshall and the Movies” has to offer, so give one of the links a click.

The Poll

This is the newest and most flimsy section of the sidebar at the moment.  In an ideal world, I could get the actual poll in the sidebar rather than the actual link (see Cut the Crap Movie Reviews for what I would really like to do).  But for now, click the link and cast your vote in my movies-related poll.  For the overwhelming majority of you all who don’t COMMENT, at least do me the favor of taking the poll.  It’s an anonymous way for you to share your opinions with me.

Categories

Categories

Pretty simple stuff. If you want to compartmentalize your reading experience, pick a category and you will see only posts falling under that topic.

One thing has changed since I took this snapshot: the deletion of the “Mini-Reviews” category.  I just didn’t see anything that distinguished them from normal reviews.

Recent Comments

Many people have dreamed of having their name in lights.  I can offer you something close if you comment: your name on the sidebar.  Yet another incentive to comment!

Sorry if I’m being really terse in this post; I’m just insanely tired right now.  But again, I’ll open the post up to comments and suggestions about the sidebar.





Random Factoid #258

12 04 2010

Recently, I’ve been reading quite a bit on how to better reach people with my blog.  A constant suggestion is the use of social networking.

But here’s my thing: I hate Twitter and I will NEVER get one.  Ever.

Anyone who knows me or reads me is surely aware that I am a massive Facebook-er.  So why am I so opposed to Twitter?  Here’s my reason.

My least favorite part of Facebook is the status update.  I’m sorry, but I don’t want to know what you are doing at all times of the day.  If I do, I will go look at your profile.  So why on earth would I want to commit to Twitter, which is basically ONLY status updates.  Unless you are Jason Reitman, who fascinates me, I don’t want to know every little thought that pops into your head.

So, I will never get a personal (or blogging) Twitter.  You will NEVER catch me Tweeting.





Explaining the Sidebar, Part 1

12 04 2010

I think that the sidebar is a very integral part of “Marshall and the Movies.”  It has not come to my attention that anyone has had any problems with it, but nonetheless I felt like it deserved some ‘splainin (Lucy and Ricky style).

So, in this three-part series, I will dissect the sidebar and how you, the reader, can optimize your experience by using it.

The "Search" Box

Pretty self-explanatory, I think.  Type in anything you want, and you’ll find anything that has ever appeared on the site with those words.  For example, if you want to find all the times that I have talked about “Avatar,” just type it in.  You’ll find my review and plenty of other posts where I referenced it.

But say you want to find the last movie I described as dreadful.  Type in dreadful, and you will see my review of “Clash of the Titans.”  The word is hidden somewhere in the post; from there on it becomes a seek-and-find on your part.  (NOTE: The search tool doesn’t pick up negation, so I could have said “Clash of the Titans” was not dreadful.  I didn’t, but it could happen for some other movie.)

The "Subscribe" Button

The subscribe button is a relatively new addition to the sidebar; I added it on the suggestion of other bloggers who say that it’s a great way to encourage traffic and reader loyalty.  It looks intimidating, but let me explain it for you as simply as possible.

Are you one of those people who so longs for an e-mail just so you can hear the ping?  Or to have that great feeling of importance of getting an e-mail?  Subscribe to “Marshall and the Movies,” and you can get that feeling all the time!  Because I publish a random factoid daily, you are guaranteed at least one e-mail a day.  And most days, I publish some additional content, so that’s up to two e-mails a day!  Are you feeling stoked yet?!  Just type in your e-mail address and hit “Yes! I want updates!”

The LAMB (Large Association of Movie Blogs)

To the normal reader, this strange photo is probably the biggest unknown on the sidebar.  What is it?  Should I click it?

Yes, I would LOVE for you to click it.  Here’s how it works: I’m a member of a very large conglomeration of movie blogs, called the LAMB.  It’s a nice community for movie bloggers, and I’ve been unfortunately limited in my interactions with them due to my hectic life.  However, by directing traffic to their site, you can put me on the “LAMB Leaderboard,” a prominently featured part of the site which would in turn bring flocks back to “Marshall and the Movies.”  It’s a win-win situation for clicking, so why not do it 7 or 8 times?

My note to every reader.

I have made no efforts to keep my commenting problems secret (taking the reverse Sandra Bullock approach, if you will).  So I have left any old reader a note imploring them to comment.

Please, non-blogging readers, I really NEED your comments!  Unlike most bloggers, I don’t write for the blogging community.  I write for the average moviegoer who deserves to hear an average person’s take on cinema.  So help me out here – please (yes, again with the nice manners).

Do you, as readers, have any suggestions on the sidebar?  In particular, I’d like to know what you think about the order that the boxes are arranged in.  Is it really as easy to use as it can be?





Random Factoid #257

11 04 2010

I have a nasty habit of letting my iTunes rentals sit for almost all of their 30 day rental periods.  Then, I scramble to watch them before they expire – which is not a fun way to watch a movie.

Procrastination is just pervading through my life.  Love it.





Random Factoid #256

10 04 2010

This makes me really happy.  I think the picture explains it all.

Glad to know Google knows me.





F.I.L.M. of the Week (April 9, 2010)

9 04 2010

Those of you who read this blog in December and January know that I’m kind of obsessed with the work of director Jason Reitman.  While doing some research on him, I came across some of his cinematic influences.  One of the filmmakers he lists is Alexander Payne.  I had seen one of Payne’s movies, “Election,” but I decided that I needed to further explore.  “Sideways” was good, but it’s not something people my age are supposed to get.  The movie that really struck me was “About Schmidt,” so much in fact that I even decided to call it my “F.I.L.M. of the Week.”  (And just for the sake of the occasional refresher, the acronym stands for First-Class, Independent Little-Known Movie.)

The titular character, Warren Schmidt (Jack Nicholson), is at an end-of-life crisis.  After retiring, he enters the twilight years with cynicism and boredom.  His wife is aging quickly, and Schmidt often wonders where the woman that he married has gone.  His daughter (Hope Davis) is marrying a dimwitted guy who sports a mullet (Dermot Mulroney).  Despite his best attempts, he can’t get her to reconsider.  In all aspects of life, Schmidt feels useless.

But soon Schmidt is left alone, and he decides to recapture control of his life by driving a Winnebago to see sights from his childhood en route to the wedding.  Even after logging all these miles, he still can’t escape the feeling that his life is inconsequential.

“About Schmidt” is at its best whenever it shows Schmidt trying to make a difference in someone’s life.  After seeing an ad on TV, he decides to sponsor a child in Tanzania named Ndugu.  He can’t pronounce the name, but Schmidt earnestly wants to help this child.  He goes further beyond providing monetary support and makes contact with Ndugu, writing him many revealing letters about his own life.  It’s somewhat pathetic to think that Schmidt can only tell these things to Ndugu, but it further reveals how lost this man is.

It’s easy to see how movies like this have influenced Jason Reitman (for example, the wedding scenes in this and “Up in the Air”) and other directors, and “About Schmidt” is a movie that deserves to be imitated.  Jack Nicholson gives no doubt as to why he is one of the best – if not the best – actors of our time.  The supporting performances are great as well, particularly Kathy Bates as Schmidt’s overbearing future in-law.  The Golden Globes classify this as a drama, and in large part, that’s what it is.  But “About Schmidt” has enough laughs to satisfy any moviewatching mood you could possibly be in.





Random Factoid #255

9 04 2010

A week ago, I almost blew a fuse at the ticket kiosk.  I had just looked on my iPhone Fandango app and seen that it was going to cost me $10.50 (too much) to see “Clash of the Titans.”  With parking garage traffic looking congested and not much time to spare before the movie started, I decided to grab my friend’s cash and bolt for the theater to buy the tickets.  The following conversation took place with the woman at the counter.

MARSHALL: I’ll have two tickets for “Clash of the Titans” in 3D at 1:40.

TICKET LADY: That will be $23.00.  Do you have your Regal Card?

MARSHALL: My gosh, have you all raised your prices?

TICKET LADY: It costs more for 3D.  (Side commentary: Well, DUH!)

MARSHALL: No, it didn’t always cost this much to see a 3D movie.

TICKET LADY: I don’t know.  (Side commentary: Yes, you do.  You just don’t want to get outsmarted by me.)

Then there was just awkward silence.  But I almost said, “You can’t keep raising the prices like this or you are going to start losing business.”

I could have used the price discrepancy to get my refund, and I could have used the quality of “Clash of the Titans” as further reason.  But I didn’t.





REVIEW: The Box

8 04 2010

There was one thing that struck me immediately when I started watching “The Box“: it’s one of the most over-directed movies I have ever seen.  It’s like the little kid who puts shaving cream on his face and thinks he is just like his dad.  With all the ominous music and long, drawn-out shots, Richard Kelly has convinced himself that he has made “The Shining.”  But he is no Stanley Kubrick, and “The Box” is no “The Shining.”  In fact, the movie dabbles its toes in so many different genres that we can never be quite sure exactly what it wants to be.

Is it a mystery?  Well, the insane predictability of the script prevents us from ever really wondering what’s going to happen.  But even if you put that aside, “The Box” is about as subtle as a shotgun in a schoolyard.  All of the symbolism (NASA?  Sartre and “No Exit?”) is so obvious that it sucks any suspense out of the movie.

Is it science-fiction?  Well, the movie works in some sci-fi elements, but they are incorporated as oddly and awkwardly as the aliens in the fourth “Indiana Jones” movie.  I would have been so happy had “The Box” just stuck to analyzing the morality and ethics of pressing a button that gives you a million dollars at the cost of a random person’s life.

Is it horror?  It so desperately wants to be, but the only thing that scared me was the scorched side of Frank Langella’s face, which looks like a half-assed Two-Face.  And even that didn’t really scare me, per se, so much as it gave me a few chills.

Is it a thriller?  Any chance I had at being “thrilled” went out the window after about 10 minutes when I realized that the sluggish pace wasn’t going to let up.  And at all the potential moments of exhilaration, I was too busy ridiculing what I had just seen.

While being none of these things, “The Box” actually manages to be quite a good comedy.  It’s pretty hard not to get a good chuckle out of Cameron Diaz’s horrendous Southern accent, which manages to make Sandra Bullock’s “The Blind Side” dialect seem completely natural.  The movie takes itself way too seriously, and that often leads to some good comedy.  The dialogue is so ridiculous that it becomes quite hilarious, particularly when Diaz delivers it.  But even as a comedy, “The Box” is still a pratfall, just like it is as any other genre.  C- /





Random Factoid #254

8 04 2010

Where have all the sneak previews gone?

They were such a staple of my childhood – I remember seeing “Hercules,” “The Princess Diaries,” and “Freaky Friday” weeks before the general public.  Sure, I still manage to see movies early thanks to free screenings.  But there’s just not the same vibrant atmosphere, something I believe to be due largely in part to the fact that free screenings are filled with people who might have trouble affording movies.  Thus the crying babies and often lacking etiquette.

Anyone else care to lament with me?





Oscar Moment: “How to Train Your Dragon”

7 04 2010

Yesterday, “How to Train Your Dragon” passed $100 million at the box office, a reliable milestone signifying success finding an audience.  Naturally, I think this calls for an Oscar Moment discussing its chances in the Best Animated Feature.

Being a crowd favorite is something that helps when it comes to the Best Animated Feature category.  6 out of the 9 winners were the highest grossers in the field, and two of the others were $200 million grossers (the odd man out is “Spirited Away” which made only $10 million).  Although it’s unlikely to reach the bucks of a Pixar flick, “How to Train Your Dragon” still has the bucks to gain serious consideration in the category.

But can it topple a Pixar movie in the category that they practically own?

Based on the reviews, we know the critics aren’t against it.  The 98% critical approval rating of “How to Train Your Dragon” is equivalent to last year’s winner “Up” and bests all other winners.  Being well-reviewed is essential to win Best Animated Feature, which has scored an average of four percentage points higher than Best Picture winners since the category’s inception.  (The average would be a 96% – up seven percentage points – if you omit 2006, which really didn’t offer any good animated movies.)

The circumstances beyond the movie’s control will either kill it or give a giant boost.  Much depends on Pixar’s “Toy Story 3,” which is the obvious favorite to win and will open with massive expectations.  I see two scenarios working out: either “Toy Story 3” is a massive success and it takes the category like most are predicting, OR the tiniest thing is wrong and the movie is considered a disappointment.  Knowing Pixar, it’s best not to bet against the first scenario, but the latter is a definite possibility.  If Pixar doesn’t topple its own standards, voters might feel reluctant to give the studio another trophy.  Denying it to them would send a message that the lamp logo before a movie doesn’t ensure Oscar victory, and the beneficiary could very well be “How to Train Your Dragon.”

But as for other factors, the movie also has to contend with another DreamWorks Animation release in November, “Megamind.”  I’m not predicting this to be a critical hit just based on the fact that it stars Will Ferrell, but I could be wrong.  In the unlikely case that it does score critically, the studio will have a handful promoting two deserving movies for Best Animated Feature.  Depending on how many animated movies are released that year, there may not be five slots like there were this year.  If it does come down to three nominees in the category, the votes could easily cancel each other out.

The release date could hurt it as well.  Since it is being released about 11 months away from voting, it will have to really have staying power.  Voters will have to remember how the movie made them feel and how exhilarated they felt in 3D, because by the time DreamWorks starts screening the movie, it will most likely be out on DVD.

At the moment, it’s safe to say that “How to Train Your Dragon” is no longer a dark horse because it has a good outside shot at winning.  It will need some help, and we will see in a matter of months if that aid will pan out.  And in case you were wondering, I don’t think we are looking at a potential Best Picture nominee here.  “Up” was a deeply sentimental movie, and it was a reward for all the good work Pixar has done in the last 15 years.

BEST BETS FOR NOMINATIONS: Best Animated Feature





Random Factoid #253

7 04 2010

The inspiration for this factoid came from The M0vie Blog reporting that there have been so many people demanding refunds for “Greenberg” that L.A. theaters have had to post signs about it (such as the one on my left).

I have never been so upset by a movie that I have gone to the ticket counter and demanded a refund.  I was actually quite tempted to do so on Friday for “Clash of the Titans,” but there was more to it than that.  Look for more on my experience in a future factoid.

But based on the quality of a movie alone, I have never gone to demand a refund.  Usually I’m mad at myself for seeing the movie; I have a hard time blaming the theater owners.

Hopefully I’ll never have to declare this factoid false.  But what about you?  Anyone seen the movie that really is that bad?

(Oh, and another random little tidbit: I wouldn’t have found this amusing post had it not been for Anomalous Material’s review of “Greenberg.”)